» Articles » PMID: 38499668

Preliminary Report on Embolization with Quick-soluble Gelatin Sponge Particles for Angiographically Negative Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Mar 19
PMID 38499668
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prophylactic embolization is usually performed using gelatin sponge particles, which are absorbed within several weeks, for managing angiographically negative gastrointestinal bleeding. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) with quick-soluble gelatin sponge particles (QS-GSP) that dissolve in less than 4 h for treating angiographically negative gastrointestinal bleeding. We included ten patients (M:F = 7:3; mean age, 64.3 years) who underwent prophylactic TAE with QS-GSP for angiographically negative acute gastrointestinal bleeding between 2021 and 2023. The technical success rate of TAE, clinical outcomes focusing on rebleeding, and procedure-related complications were evaluated. The embolized arteries were the gastroduodenal (n = 3), jejunal (n = 4), and ileal (n = 3) arteries. QS-GSP (150-350 µm or 350-560 µm) were used alone (n = 8) or in combination with a coil (n = 1). A 100% technical success rate was accomplished. In 1 patient (10%), rebleeding occurred 2 days after prophylactic TAE of the gastroduodenal artery, and this was managed by repeat TAE. There were no procedure-related complications. The use of QS-GSP for prophylactic TAE appears to be safe and effective for controlling bleeding among patients with angiographically negative gastrointestinal bleeding. There were no cases of related ischemic complications of the embolized bowels likely attributable to recanalization of the affected arteries following biodegradation of QS-GSP.

Citing Articles

3D Printing of Naturally Derived Adhesive Hemostatic Sponge.

Zhou M, Yuan T, Shang L Research (Wash D C). 2024; 7:0446.

PMID: 39119591 PMC: 11309851. DOI: 10.34133/research.0446.

References
1.
Chang J, Lye T, Zhu H, Syn N, Tang S, Gogna A . Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Transarterial Embolization for High-Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021; 32(4):576-584.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.12.005. View

2.
Bua-Ngam C, Norasetsingh J, Treesit T, Wedsart B, Chansanti O, Tapaneeyakorn J . Efficacy of emergency transarterial embolization in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A single-center experience. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017; 98(6):499-505. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.02.005. View

3.
Yu Q, Liu C, Collura B, Navuluri R, Patel M, Yu Z . Prophylactic transcatheter arterial embolization for high-risk ulcers following endoscopic hemostasis: a meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2021; 16(1):29. PMC: 8194167. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00371-2. View

4.
Shin J . Recent update of embolization of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Korean J Radiol. 2012; 13 Suppl 1:S31-9. PMC: 3341458. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.S1.S31. View

5.
Ye T, Yang L, Wang Q, Liu J, Zhou C, Zheng C . Analysis of negative DSA findings in patients with acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding: A retrospective study of 133 patients. J Interv Med. 2021; 2(1):27-30. PMC: 8562268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimed.2019.05.007. View