» Articles » PMID: 38496887

Green Cleanup of Styrene-contaminated Soil by Carbon-based Nanoscale Zero-valent Iron and Phytoremediation: Sunn Hemp (, Zinnia ( Cav.), and Marigold ( L

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Mar 18
PMID 38496887
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accidental chemical spills can result in styrene-contaminated soil. Styrene negatively affects human health and the environment. The objective of this study was to remediate styrene-contaminated soil using a combination of activated carbon-based nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI-AC) and phytoremediation by sunn hemp (), zinnia ( Cav.) and marigolds ( L.). The results showed that all three plant types could potentially increase the removal efficiency of styrene-contaminated soil. At 28 days, all three plants showed complete removal of styrene from the soil with 1 g/kg of nZVI-AC, activated carbon-based nZVI synthesized by tea leaves () (T-nZVI-AC), or activated carbon-based nZVI synthesized by red Thai holy basil ( L.) (B-nZVI-AC). However, styrene removal efficiencies of sunn hemp, zinnia, and marigold without carbon-based nZVI were 30%, 67%, and 56%, respectively. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) revealed that the removal efficiencies differed significantly from those of phytoremediation alone. With the same removal efficiency (100%), the biomass of sunn hemp in nano-phytoremediation treatments differed by approximately 55%, whereas the biomass of zinnia differed by >67%, compared with that of the control experiment. For marigold, the difference in biomass was only 30%. Styrene was adsorbed on surface of soil and AC and then further oxidized under air-water-nZVI environment, while phytovolatilization played an important role in transporting the remaining styrene from the contaminated soil to the air. Marigold was used as an alternative plant for the nano-phytoremediation of styrene-contaminated soil because of its sturdy nature, high biomass, tolerance to toxic effects, and ease of cultivation. Remediation of one cubic meter of styrene-contaminated soil by a combination of carbon-based nanoscale zero-valent iron and phytoremediation by marigolds emitted 0.0027 kgCO/m.

Citing Articles

Phytoremediation of Oil-Contaminated Soil by L. Combined with Biochar and Microbial Agent.

Fang X, Zheng P, Wang H, Wang K, Shi C, Shi F Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39861597 PMC: 11768401. DOI: 10.3390/plants14020243.


Phytoremediation strategies for mitigating environmental toxicants.

Aryal M Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38683.

PMID: 39430524 PMC: 11490803. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38683.

References
1.
Gill R, Thornton S, Harbottle M, Smith J . Sustainability assessment of electrokinetic bioremediation compared with alternative remediation options for a petroleum release site. J Environ Manage. 2016; 184(Pt 1):120-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.036. View

2.
Huang D, Qin X, Peng Z, Liu Y, Gong X, Zeng G . Nanoscale zero-valent iron assisted phytoremediation of Pb in sediment: Impacts on metal accumulation and antioxidative system of Lolium perenne. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018; 153:229-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.01.060. View

3.
Teng Y, Shen Y, Luo Y, Sun X, Sun M, Fu D . Influence of Rhizobium meliloti on phytoremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by alfalfa in an aged contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 186(2-3):1271-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.126. View

4.
Choi Y, Thompson J, Lin D, Cho Y, Ismail N, Hsieh C . Secondary environmental impacts of remedial alternatives for sediment contaminated with hydrophobic organic contaminants. J Hazard Mater. 2015; 304:352-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.069. View

5.
Romeh A, Ibrahim Saber R . Green nano-phytoremediation and solubility improving agents for the remediation of chlorfenapyr contaminated soil and water. J Environ Manage. 2020; 260:110104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110104. View