» Articles » PMID: 38495183

Identification of Bioactive Compounds of As Potential Inhibitor of Pyruvate Kinase M2 (PKM2): Computational and Virtual Screening Approaches

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Mar 18
PMID 38495183
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

PKM2 (Pyruvate kinase M2) is the isoform of pyruvate kinase which is known to catalyse the last step of glycolysis that is responsible for energy production. This specific isoform is known to be highly expressed in certain cancerous conditions. Considering the role of this protein in various cancer conditions, we used PKM2 as a target protein to identify the potential compounds against this target. In this study, we have examined 96 compounds of using an array of computational and in silico tools. The compounds were assessed for toxicity then their anticancer potential was predicted. The virtual screening was done with molecular docking followed by a detailed examination using molecular dynamics simulation. The majority of the compounds showed a higher probability of being antineoplastic. Based on toxicity, predicted anticancer potential, binding affinity, and binding site, three compounds (nevadensin, asarinin, and kaempferol) were selected as hit compounds. The binding energy of these compounds with PKM2 ranged from -7.7 to -8.3 kcal/mol and all hit compounds interact at the active site of the protein. The selected hit compounds formed a stable complex with PKM2 when simulated under physiological conditions. The dynamic analysis showed that these compounds remained attached to the active site till the completion of molecular simulation. MM-PBSA analysis showed that nevadensin exhibited a higher affinity towards PKM2 compared to asarinin and kaempferol. These compounds need to be assessed properties in vivo and in vitro to validate their efficacy.

References
1.
Alam F, Din K, Rasheed R, Sadiq A, Jan M, Minhas A . Phytochemical investigation, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic and antinociceptive activities of DC extracts-in vivo and in vitro experiments. Heliyon. 2020; 6(11):e05571. PMC: 7701350. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05571. View

2.
Ding K, Zhang H, Wang H, Lv X, Pan L, Zhang W . Atomic-scale investigation of the interactions between tetrabromobisphenol A, tetrabromobisphenol S and bovine trypsin by spectroscopies and molecular dynamics simulations. J Hazard Mater. 2015; 299:486-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.050. View

3.
Forli S, Huey R, Pique M, Sanner M, Goodsell D, Olson A . Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite. Nat Protoc. 2016; 11(5):905-19. PMC: 4868550. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2016.051. View

4.
Cheng F, Shen J, Yu Y, Li W, Liu G, Lee P . In silico prediction of Tetrahymena pyriformis toxicity for diverse industrial chemicals with substructure pattern recognition and machine learning methods. Chemosphere. 2010; 82(11):1636-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.043. View

5.
Qais F, Sarwar T, Ahmad I, Khan R, Shahzad S, Husain F . Glyburide inhibits non-enzymatic glycation of HSA: An approach for the management of AGEs associated diabetic complications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020; 169:143-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.096. View