» Articles » PMID: 38493055

Epidemiology of Perioperative Anaphylaxis in France in 2017-2018: the 11th GERAP Survey

Abstract

Background: Perioperative anaphylaxis is rare but is associated with significant morbidity. This complication has been well described in France by the GERAP (Groupe d'Etude des Réactions Anaphylactiques Périopératoires), a network focused on its study. The epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis is evolving, influenced by environmental factors and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to update the epidemiology of perioperative anaphylaxis in France.

Methods: This multicentre retrospective study was performed in 26 allergy clinics of the GERAP network in 2017-8.

Results: There were 765 patients with perioperative anaphylaxis included. Most cases were severe, with 428 (56%) reactions graded as 3 or 4 according to the Ring and Messmer classification. Skin test results were available for 676 patients, with a culprit agent identified in 471 cases (70%). Neuromuscular blocking agents were the main cause of perioperative anaphylaxis (n=281; 60%), followed by antibiotics (n=118; 25%) and patent blue dye (n=11; 2%). Cefazolin was the main antibiotic responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis (52% of antibiotic-related reactions). Suxamethonium and rocuronium were the main neuromuscular blocking agents responsible for perioperative anaphylaxis with 7.1 (6.1-8.4) and 5.6 (4.2-7.4) reactions per 100,000 vials sold, respectively, whereas cefazolin-related cases were estimated at 0.7 (0.5-0.9) reactions per 100,000 vials sold.

Conclusions: Our results confirm that most commonly identified triggering agents remain neuromuscular blocking agents. Reactions to antibiotics, particularly cefazolin, are becoming increasingly frequent. The origin of sensitisation to cefazolin is unknown, as no cross-sensitisation has been described, and it should be the subject of further study. Perioperative anaphylaxis should be followed over the years and understood given the changing triggers.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04654923).

Citing Articles

Paediatric perioperative hypersensitivity: the performance of the current consensus formula and the effect of uneventful anaesthesia on serum tryptase. Reply to 2024; 9: 100254.

Vlaeminck N, van der Poorten M, Saldien V, Sabato V, Ebo D BJA Open. 2024; 12:100308.

PMID: 39350917 PMC: 11440283. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100308.


Management of Refractory Anaphylaxis: An Overview of Current Guidelines.

Pouessel G, Dribin T, Tacquard C, Tanno L, Cardona V, Worm M Clin Exp Allergy. 2024; 54(7):470-488.

PMID: 38866583 PMC: 11439156. DOI: 10.1111/cea.14514.


Remimazolam anaphylaxis in a patient not allergic to brotizolam: a case report and literature review.

Nakai T, Kako E, Ota H, So M, Sobue K BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):204.

PMID: 38851690 PMC: 11161983. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02591-w.

References
1.
Ebo D, Clarke R, Mertes P, Platt P, Sabato V, Sadleir P . Molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology of perioperative hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123(1):e38-e49. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.031. View

2.
Reddy J, Cooke P, van Schalkwyk J, Hannam J, Fitzharris P, Mitchell S . Anaphylaxis is more common with rocuronium and succinylcholine than with atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2014; 122(1):39-45. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000512. View

3.
Mertes P, Tacquard C . Perioperative anaphylaxis: when the allergological work-up goes negative. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023; 23(4):287-293. DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000912. View

4.
Chiriac A, Tacquard C, Fadhel N, Pellerin C, Malinovsky J, Mertes P . Safety of subsequent general anaesthesia in patients allergic to neuromuscular blocking agents: value of allergy skin testing. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120(6):1437-1440. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.004. View

5.
Garvey L, Dewachter P, Hepner D, Mertes P, Voltolini S, Clarke R . Management of suspected immediate perioperative allergic reactions: an international overview and consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123(1):e50-e64. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.044. View