Question Prompt List Intervention for Patients with Advanced Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview

Journal Support Care Cancer

Specialties Critical Care
Oncology

Date 2024 Mar 16

PMID 38492095

Authors

Shu-Jung Wang

Wen-Yu Hu

Yun-Chen Chang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Enhanced communication in end-of-life care (EOL) improves preparation and treatment decisions for patients with advanced cancer, affecting their quality of life at the end of life. Question prompt list (QPL) has been shown to enhance physician-patient communication in patients with cancer, but there is a lack of systematic review and meta-analysis for those with advanced cancer. Enhanced communication in end-of-life care improves preparation and treatment decisions for patients with advanced cancer, affecting their quality of life at the end of life.

Objective: To review the effectiveness of QPL intervention on physician-patient communication and health outcomes during consultation in patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases were undertaken using inclusion criteria for relevant articles up to August 2021. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and modified Jadad scale to assess the quality of the studies.

Results: Seven RCTs with 1059 participants were included, of which six studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled meta-analysis results indicated that QPL in patients with advanced cancer had a significant positive effect on the total number of questions asked (SMD, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.18; I = 83%) and on the patients' expectations for the future (SMD, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.08 to 1.25; I = 88%). There were no significant improvements in health-related outcomes such as end of life, anxiety, and quality of life.

Conclusions: Using QPL in advanced cancer consultations boosts patient questions which helps communication but not health-related indicators. Optimal results depend on full reading, but timing varies. Future research should examine the relationship between communication and health outcomes, including patient/physician behavior and social context.

References

Schuttengruber G, Halfens R, Lohrmann C . 'End of life': a concept analysis. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2022; 28(7):314-321. DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.7.314. View

Wantonoro W, Suryaningsih E, Anita D, Van Nguyen T . Palliative Care: A Concept Analysis Review. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022; 8:23779608221117379. PMC: 9364202. DOI: 10.1177/23779608221117379. View

Rietjens J, Sudore R, Connolly M, van Delden J, Drickamer M, Droger M . Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(9):e543-e551. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X. View

Starr L, Ulrich C, Corey K, Meghani S . Associations Among End-of-Life Discussions, Health-Care Utilization, and Costs in Persons With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019; 36(10):913-926. PMC: 6711813. DOI: 10.1177/1049909119848148. View

Best M, McArdle M, Huang Y, Clayton J, Butow P . How and how much is spirituality discussed in palliative care consultations for advanced cancer patients with and without a question prompt list?. Patient Educ Couns. 2019; 102(12):2208-2213. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.016. View

Brighton L, Bristowe K . Communication in palliative care: talking about the end of life, before the end of life. Postgrad Med J. 2016; 92(1090):466-70. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133368. View

Collins A, McLachlan S, Philip J . Communication about palliative care: A phenomenological study exploring patient views and responses to its discussion. Palliat Med. 2017; 32(1):133-142. DOI: 10.1177/0269216317735247. View

Kimura Y, Hosoya M, Toju K, Shimizu C, Morita T . Barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patient as perceived by oncologists, certified/specialized nurses in cancer nursing and medical social workers. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020; 50(12):1426-1433. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa146. View

Walczak A, Butow P, Tattersall M, Davidson P, Young J, Epstein R . Encouraging early discussion of life expectancy and end-of-life care: A randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led communication support program for patients and caregivers. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016; 67:31-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.10.008. View

10.

Henselmans I, Smets E, Han P, de Haes H, van Laarhoven H . How long do I have? Observational study on communication about life expectancy with advanced cancer patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2017; 100(10):1820-1827. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.05.012. View

11.

Applebaum A, Kolva E, Kulikowski J, Jacobs J, DeRosa A, Lichtenthal W . Conceptualizing prognostic awareness in advanced cancer: a systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2013; 19(9):1103-19. PMC: 4665620. DOI: 10.1177/1359105313484782. View

12.

Steinhauser K, Christakis N, Clipp E, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky J . Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000; 284(19):2476-82. DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.19.2476. View

13.

Brom L, Pasman H, Widdershoven G, van der Vorst M, Reijneveld J, Postma T . Patients' preferences for participation in treatment decision-making at the end of life: qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e100435. PMC: 4070976. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100435. View

14.

Licqurish S, Cook O, Pattuwage L, Saunders C, Jefford M, Koczwara B . Tools to facilitate communication during physician-patient consultations in cancer care: An overview of systematic reviews. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69(6):497-520. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21573. View

15.

Thode M, Pasman H, van Vliet L, Damman O, Ket J, Francke A . Feasibility and effectiveness of tools that support communication and decision making in life-prolonging treatments for patients in hospital: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020; 12(3):262-269. PMC: 9411882. DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002284. View

16.

Brandes K, Linn A, Butow P, van Weert J . The characteristics and effectiveness of Question Prompt List interventions in oncology: a systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology. 2014; 24(3):245-52. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3637. View

17.

Cegala D, Post D . The impact of patients' participation on physicians' patient-centered communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 77(2):202-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.025. View

18.

Street Jr R, Makoul G, Arora N, Epstein R . How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 74(3):295-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. View

19.

Riedl D, Schussler G . The Influence of Doctor-Patient Communication on Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2017; 63(2):131-150. DOI: 10.13109/zptm.2017.63.2.131. View

20.

Miller E . Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: a theoretical framework for evaluation. J Telemed Telecare. 2003; 8(6):311-8. DOI: 10.1258/135763302320939185. View