Pregnancy and Obstetric Outcomes of Dichorionic Triamniotic Triplet Pregnancies with Selective Foetal Reduction After Assisted Reproductive Technology

Overview

Journal Reprod Biol Endocrinol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Endocrinology
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2024 Mar 16

PMID 38491531

Authors

Shuhua Liu

Qianhua Xu

Dehong Liu

Qiuru Li

Jingyu Qian

Bin Zhang

Xianxia Chen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: It is generally beneficial and recommended that dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplet pregnancies be reduced to monochorionic (MC) twin or singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, some infertile couples still have a firm desire to retain twins. For this reason, the best foetal reduction strategies need to be available for infertile couples and clinicians. Given that data on the elective reduction of DCTA triplet pregnancies to twin pregnancies are scarce, we investigated the outcomes of elective reduction of DCTA triplet pregnancies through the retrospective analysis of previous data.

Method: Patients with DCTA triplet pregnancies who underwent elective foetal reduction between January 2012 and June 2020 were recruited. A total of 67 eligible patients with DCTA triplet pregnancies were divided into two groups: a DCTA-to-dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin group (n = 38) and a DCTA-to-monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin group (n = 29); the basic clinical data of the two groups were collected for comparison.

Results: Compared with the DCDA-to-MCDA twin group, the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had lower rates of complete miscarriage (7.89% versus 31.03%, p = 0.014), early complete miscarriage (5.26% versus 24.14%, p = 0.034), late preterm birth (25.71% versus 65.00%, p = 0.009) and very low birth weight (0 versus 11.11%, p = 0.025). In addition, the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had higher rates of full-term delivery (65.71% versus 25.00%, p = 0.005), survival (92.11% versus 68.97%, p = 0.023), and taking the babies home (92.11% versus 68.97%, p = 0.023) than did the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group. In terms of neonatal outcomes, a significantly greater gestational age (38.06 ± 2.39 versus 36.28 ± 2.30, p = 0.009), average birth weight (3020.77 ± 497.33 versus 2401.39 ± 570.48, p < 0.001), weight of twins (2746.47 ± 339.64 versus 2251.56 ± 391.26, p < 0.001), weight of the larger neonate (2832.94 ± 320.58 versus 2376.25 ± 349.95, p < 0.001) and weight of the smaller neonate (2660.00 ± 345.34 versus 2126.88 ± 400.93, p < 0.001) was observed in the DCTA-to-DCDA twin group compared to the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group.

Conclusion: The DCTA-to-DCDA twin group had better pregnancy and neonatal outcomes than the DCTA-to-MCDA twin group. This reduction approach may be beneficial for patients with dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies who have a strong desire to have DCDA twins.

Citing Articles

Dichorionic triamniotic triplets after two blastocysts transfer underwent multifetal pregnancy reduction: two case reports and literature review.

Xu Q, Li M, Wang X, Lu H, Zou W BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):492.

PMID: 39237895 PMC: 11375843. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03324-4.

References

Glinianaia S, Obeysekera M, Sturgiss S, Bell R . Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(9):2549-57. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der213. View

Yaron Y, Dave N, Moldenhauer J, Kramer R, Johnson M, Evans M . Multifetal pregnancy reductions of triplets to twins: comparison with nonreduced triplets and twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180(5):1268-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70627-7. View

Skiadas C, Missmer S, Benson C, Acker D, Racowsky C . Impact of selective reduction of the monochorionic pair in in vitro fertilization triplet pregnancies on gestational length. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(7):2930-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.032. View

Sobek Jr A, Zborilova B, Prochazka M, Silhanova E, Koutna O, Klaskova E . High incidence of monozygotic twinning after assisted reproduction is related to genetic information, but not to assisted reproduction technology itself. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(3):756-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.098. View

van Baar P, Bij de Weg J, Ten Hove E, Schoonmade L, van de Mheen L, Pajkrt E . Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy after multifetal pregnancy reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2023; 42(1):2225597. DOI: 10.1080/10641955.2023.2225597. View

Iberico G, Navarro J, Blasco L, Simon C, Pellicer A, Remohi J . Embryo reduction of multifetal pregnancies following assisted reproduction treatment: a modification of the transvaginal ultrasound-guided technique. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(10):2228-33. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.10.2228. View

Sherer D . Adverse perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: review of the literature. Am J Perinatol. 2001; 18(1):23-37. DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12937. View

Acosta-Rojas R, Becker J, Munoz-Abellana B, Ruiz C, Carreras E, Gratacos E . Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 96(2):98-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.002. View

Mhatre M, Craigo S . General Principles for Counseling and Management of Triplet Pregnancies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 66(4):854-863. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000814. View

10.

van de Mheen L, Everwijn S, Knapen M, Oepkes D, Engels M, Manten G . The effectiveness of multifetal pregnancy reduction in trichorionic triplet gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211(5):536.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.04.023. View

11.

Knopman J, Krey L, Lee J, Fino M, Novetsky A, Noyes N . Monozygotic twinning: an eight-year experience at a large IVF center. Fertil Steril. 2009; 94(2):502-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.064. View

12.

Liu Y, Shen Y, Zhang H, Tang Y, Lu G, Lin G . Clinical outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies: A retrospective observational study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 58(1):133-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.025. View

13.

Lewi L, Deprest J, Hecher K . The vascular anastomoses in monochorionic twin pregnancies and their clinical consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 208(1):19-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.025. View

14.

. Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231. Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 137(6):e145-e162. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004397. View

15.

Lopriore E, Stroeken H, Sueters M, Meerman R, Walther F, Vandenbussche F . Term perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87(5):541-5. DOI: 10.1080/00016340802050668. View

16.

Verpoest W, Van Landuyt L, Desmyttere S, Cremers A, Devroey P, Liebaers I . The incidence of monozygotic twinning following PGD is not increased. Hum Reprod. 2009; 24(11):2945-50. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep280. View

17.

Abbas A, Johnson M, Bersinger N, Nicolaides K . Maternal alpha-fetoprotein levels in multiple pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101(2):156-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13084.x. View

18.

Li N, Sun J, Wang J, Jian W, Lu J, Miao Y . Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 21(1):821. PMC: 8662893. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04285-4. View

19.

De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka M, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T . ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(9):1586-1601. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey242. View

20.

Martin J, Hamilton B, Sutton P, Ventura S, Menacker F, Munson M . Births: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2004; 52(10):1-113. View