» Articles » PMID: 38490619

Disparities in Access to Multidisciplinary Cancer Consultations and Treatment for Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A SEER-Medicare Analysis

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2024 Mar 15
PMID 38490619
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Disparities in access to a multidisciplinary cancer consultation (MDCc) persist, and the role of physician relationships remains understudied. This study examined the extent to which multilevel factors, including patient characteristics and patient-sharing network measures reflecting the structure of physician relationships, are associated with an MDCc and receipt of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery among patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods And Materials: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for patients diagnosed with stage I-IIA NSCLC from 2016 to 2017. We assembled patient-sharing networks and identified cancer specialists who were locally unique for their specialty, herein referred to as linchpins. The proportion of linchpin cancer specialists for each hospital referral region (HRR) was calculated as a network-based measure of specialist scarcity. We used multilevel multinomial logistic regression to estimate associations between study variables and receipt of an MDCc and multilevel logistic regression to examine the relationship between patient receipt of an MDCc and initial treatment.

Results: Our study included 6120 patients with stage I-IIA NSCLC, of whom 751 (12.3%) received an MDCc, 1729 (28.3%) consulted only a radiation oncologist, 2010 (32.8%) consulted only a surgeon, and 1630 (26.6%) consulted neither specialist within 2 months of diagnosis. Compared with patients residing in an HRR with a low proportion of linchpin surgeons, those residing in an HRR with a high proportion of linchpin surgeons had a 2.99 (95% CI, 1.87-4.78) greater relative risk of consulting only a radiation oncologist versus receiving an MDCc and a 2.70 (95% CI, 1.68-4.35) greater relative risk of consulting neither specialist versus receiving an MDCc. Patients who received an MDCc were 5.32 times (95% CI, 4.27-6.63) more likely to receive stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery.

Conclusions: Physician networks are associated with receipt of an MDCc and treatment, underscoring the potential for leveraging patient-sharing network analysis to improve access to lung cancer care.

Citing Articles

Surgeon and Care Team Network Measures and Timely Breast Cancer Treatment.

Ash R, Scodari B, Schaefer A, Cornelius S, Brooks G, OMalley A JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(8):e2427451.

PMID: 39207756 PMC: 11362867. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27451.

References
1.
Keane F, Driscoll E, Bowes C, Durgin B, Khandekar M, Willers H . Low Rates of Chest Wall Toxicity When Individualizing the Planning Target Volume Margin in Patients With Early Stage Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020; 11(3):e282-e291. DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.10.001. View

2.
Nemesure M, Schwedhelm T, Sacerdote S, OMalley A, Rozema L, Moen E . A measure of local uniqueness to identify linchpins in a social network with node attributes. Appl Netw Sci. 2021; 6. PMC: 8691752. DOI: 10.1007/s41109-021-00400-8. View

3.
. ASCO-ESMO consensus statement on quality cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(21):3498-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4021. View

4.
Fiscella K, Williams D . Health disparities based on socioeconomic inequities: implications for urban health care. Acad Med. 2004; 79(12):1139-47. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200412000-00004. View

5.
Mayne N, Lin B, Darling A, Raman V, Patel D, Liou D . Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Delayed Surgery for Early-stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Ann Surg. 2020; 272(6):925-929. PMC: 7668323. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004363. View