» Articles » PMID: 38489054

Offloading Systems for the Treatment of Neuropathic Foot Ulcers in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials for the Development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of commonly used offloading devices for the treatment of neuropathic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus. This meta-analysis (MA) has been performed for giving an answer to clinical questions on this topic of the Italian guideline on diabetic foot syndrome.

Methods: The present MA includes randomized controlled studies (duration > 12 weeks) comparing, in patients with diabetes mellitus and non-infected neuropathic foot ulcer: any offloading device vs either no offloading device or conventional footwear; removable versus non-removable offloading devices; surgical procedure vs other offloading approaches. The primary endpoint was ulcer healing.

Results: A total of 184 studies were identified, and 18 were considered eligible for the analysis. We found that: any plantar off-loading, when compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing (MH-OR: 3.13 [1.08, 9.11], p = 0.04, I = 0%); total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, had a higher ulcer healing rate (MH-OR: 2.64 [1.43, 4.89], p = 0.002, I = 51%); surgical offloading for active ulcers in combination with post-surgery offloading achieves higher ulcer healing rate when compared to offloading devices alone (MH-OR: 6.77 [1.64, 27.93], p = 0.008, I = 0%).

Conclusions: Any plantar offloading, compared to the absence of plantar offloading device, is associated with a higher ulcer healing rate. Total contact cast or nonremovable knee-high walker, compared to other offloading devices, is preferable. Surgical offloading for active ulcers, in combination with post-surgery offloading devices, achieves a higher ulcer healing rate when compared to other offloading devices alone. Further studies with a larger cohort of patients with diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers and extended follow-up periods are necessary.

References
1.
Armstrong D, Boulton A, Bus S . Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(24):2367-2375. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1615439. View

2.
Armstrong D, Tan T, Boulton A, Bus S . Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review. JAMA. 2023; 330(1):62-75. PMC: 10723802. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.10578. View

3.
Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan B . IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021; 183:109119. PMC: 11057359. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119. View

4.
Bus S, Valk G, van Deursen R, Armstrong D, Caravaggi C, Hlavacek P . The effectiveness of footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers and reduce plantar pressure in diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008; 24 Suppl 1:S162-80. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.850. View

5.
Lazzarini P, Raspovic K, Meloni M, van Netten J . A new declaration for feet's sake: Halving the global diabetic foot disease burden from 2% to 1% with next generation care. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023; 40(3):e3747. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3747. View