Design and Evaluation of the Pneumatic Leg Prosthesis ERiK to Assist Elderly Amputees with Sit-down and Stand-up Movements

Overview

Journal Wearable Technol

Publisher Cambridge University Press

Date 2024 Mar 15

PMID 38487767

Authors

Heike Vallery

Frederik Lachmann

Simon van der Helm

Andrew Pennycott

Gerwin Smit

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Standing up using one leg is a challenging task for those with a transfemoral amputation, particularly for elderly users with a low activity level. Active prostheses are generally not accessible to this group and available passive prostheses do not support standing up. This article presents the design and evaluation of the "Energy Restoring Intelligent Knee" (ERiK), which stores energy during sit-down in a pneumatic cylinder and returns it during stand-up. We hypothesized that the system would reduce the time needed to perform transitions and also enable higher load sharing by the prosthetic leg. However, the results of an experimental study with seven participants with transfemoral amputation contradict these hypotheses: the participants could neither move faster nor make more use of the prosthetic leg to share their body weight during transitions. We observed that a major obstacle to the useful functionality of the leg was the absence of ankle dorsiflexion - the foot tended to slip during stand-up initiation, such that only low pre-pressures and therefore support levels could be set. The rather binary action of the pneumatics also complicated movement initiation. The lessons learned from this study may be helpful to those seeking to create better designs in the future.

References

Varol H, Sup F, Goldfarb M . Powered Sit-to-Stand and Assistive Stand-to-Sit Framework for a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2010; 5209582:645-651. PMC: 2798740. DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2009.5209582. View

Dall P, Kerr A . Frequency of the sit to stand task: An observational study of free-living adults. Appl Ergon. 2009; 41(1):58-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.04.005. View

Fortington L, Rommers G, Geertzen J, Postema K, Dijkstra P . Mobility in elderly people with a lower limb amputation: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011; 13(4):319-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.12.097. View

Burger H, Kuzelicki J, Marincek C . Transition from sitting to standing after trans-femoral amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005; 29(2):139-51. DOI: 10.1080/03093640500199612. View

Gloersen O, Federolf P . Predicting Missing Marker Trajectories in Human Motion Data Using Marker Intercorrelations. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0152616. PMC: 4816448. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152616. View

Flynn L, Geeroms J, Jimenez-Fabian R, Heins S, Vanderborght B, Munih M . The Challenges and Achievements of Experimental Implementation of an Active Transfemoral Prosthesis Based on Biological Quasi-Stiffness: The CYBERLEGs Beta-Prosthesis. Front Neurorobot. 2018; 12:80. PMC: 6289037. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00080. View

Guralnik J, Simonsick E, Ferrucci L, Glynn R, Berkman L, Blazer D . A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol. 1994; 49(2):M85-94. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85. View

Kralj A, Jaeger R, Munih M . Analysis of standing up and sitting down in humans: definitions and normative data presentation. J Biomech. 1990; 23(11):1123-38. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90005-n. View

Sup F, Bohara A, Goldfarb M . Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis. Int J Rob Res. 2009; 27(2):263-273. PMC: 2773553. DOI: 10.1177/0278364907084588. View

10.

Leardini A, Sawacha Z, Paolini G, Ingrosso S, Nativo R, Benedetti M . A new anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children. Gait Posture. 2007; 26(4):560-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.018. View

11.

Galli M, Cimolin V, Crivellini M, Campanini I . Quantitative analysis of sit to stand movement: experimental set-up definition and application to healthy and hemiplegic adults. Gait Posture. 2008; 28(1):80-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.003. View

12.

Schultz A, Alexander N, Ashton-Miller J . Biomechanical analyses of rising from a chair. J Biomech. 1992; 25(12):1383-91. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90052-3. View

13.

Riley P, Schenkman M, Mann R, Hodge W . Mechanics of a constrained chair-rise. J Biomech. 1991; 24(1):77-85. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90328-k. View

14.

Hodge W, Carlson K, Fijan R, Burgess R, Riley P, Harris W . Contact pressures from an instrumented hip endoprosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71(9):1378-86. View

15.

Lindemann U, Claus H, Stuber M, Augat P, Muche R, Nikolaus T . Measuring power during the sit-to-stand transfer. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003; 89(5):466-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-003-0837-z. View

16.

Janssen W, Bussmann H, Stam H . Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement: a review. Phys Ther. 2002; 82(9):866-79. View

17.

Fortington L, Rommers G, Postema K, van Netten J, Geertzen J, Dijkstra P . Lower limb amputation in Northern Netherlands: unchanged incidence from 1991-1992 to 2003-2004. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013; 37(4):305-10. DOI: 10.1177/0309364612469385. View

18.

Schenkman M, Berger R, Riley P, Mann R, Hodge W . Whole-body movements during rising to standing from sitting. Phys Ther. 1990; 70(10):638-48; discussion 648-51. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/70.10.638. View

19.

Simon A, Fey N, Ingraham K, Finucane S, Halsne E, Hargrove L . Improved Weight-Bearing Symmetry for Transfemoral Amputees During Standing Up and Sitting Down With a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 97(7):1100-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.006. View

20.

Hoffman R, Saltzman C, Buckwalter J . Outcome of lower extremity malignancy survivors treated with transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(2):177-82. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.27461. View