» Articles » PMID: 38486911

The Effect of a Movable Headrest in Shoulder Assist Device for Overhead Work

Overview
Date 2024 Mar 15
PMID 38486911
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, many kinds of shoulder-support exoskeletons have been developed and some of them are commercially available. However, to the best of our knowledge, shoulder-support exoskeletons that have neck-support mechanism have not been found. During the overhead work, physical strain is added to not only upper limb and shoulder but also neck of workers since the workers work keeping their face raised. Therefore, in this study, to reduce the physical strain on the neck during the overhead work, a movable headrest that can be attached to the shoulder assist device was developed, which has reclining and slide functions of a head. The main purpose of this article was to evaluate usefulness of the proposed movable headrest. To this end, measurements of electromyogram were carried out under simulating an overhead work activity, and the reduction effect for physical strain of the neck was compared among three types of headrests: (a) slide-type headrest which can slide the head backward and forward, (b) reclining-type headrest which can recline the head, and (c) reclining and slide-type headrest which can recline and slide the head. In addition, usefulness of the shoulder assist device with the proposed headrest was evaluated for a realistic overhead work activity through measurements of muscular stiffness of neck and shoulder. The experimental results showed that the existence of the headrest in the shoulder assist device is effective to reduce the physical strain to the workers, and that (c) reclining and slide-type headrest is the most effective among these three types of headrests.

References
1.
Siedl S, Mara M . Exoskeleton acceptance and its relationship to self-efficacy enhancement, perceived usefulness, and physical relief: A field study among logistics workers. Wearable Technol. 2024; 2:e10. PMC: 10936393. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2021.10. View

2.
Rashedi E, Kim S, Nussbaum M, Agnew M . Ergonomic evaluation of a wearable assistive device for overhead work. Ergonomics. 2014; 57(12):1864-74. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.952682. View

3.
Pinto-Fernandez D, Torricelli D, Sanchez-Villamanan M, Aller F, Mombaur K, Conti R . Performance Evaluation of Lower Limb Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020; 28(7):1573-1583. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2989481. View

4.
Poliero T, Sposito M, Toxiri S, Di Natali C, Iurato M, Sanguineti V . Versatile and non-versatile occupational back-support exoskeletons: A comparison in laboratory and field studies. Wearable Technol. 2024; 2:e12. PMC: 10936340. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2021.9. View

5.
Thalman C, Artemiadis P . A review of soft wearable robots that provide active assistance: Trends, common actuation methods, fabrication, and applications. Wearable Technol. 2024; 1:e3. PMC: 11265391. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2020.4. View