» Articles » PMID: 38486649

Comparison of Perioperative Complication Rates of Total Extraperitoneal and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repairs in Primary Inguinal Hernia

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Mar 15
PMID 38486649
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hernia may be defined as a protrusion of viscus through layers anatomically designed to contain that viscus. Most abdominal hernias occur at well-described sites of potential weakness. Repair of inguinal hernia is one of the most common operations in general surgery. Objectives: To compare the perioperative complication rates of total extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repairs of primary inguinal hernias.

Materials And Methods: It is a randomised comparative study, conducted at the department of general surgery. A total of 50 patients were included and divided into two groups with 25 in each. Group A represents the laparoscopic TEP repair and group B represents the laparoscopic TAPP repair. Patients above 18 years with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were included. Patients having complicated inguinal hernia and history of previous abdominal surgery were excluded.

Results: We observed that hernia occurrence is more common in the 31-50 years of age group and right-sided hernia is more common. Scrotal oedema and conversion to open surgery chances are similar in both TEP and TAPP groups. The duration of surgery in TEP is significantly higher as compared to TAPP. Patients who underwent TEP experienced less pain as compared to TAPP as per visual analogue scale. Postoperative hospital stay and time taken to resume the routine activity were significantly less in case of TEP.

Conclusion: TEP is preferred over TAPP for laparoscopic hernia repair because it preserves the peritoneal integrity and has lesser postoperative pain. The early recovery and return to the routine work were seen with the patient treated with the TEP and also showed better visual analogue score than the TAPP repair group.

References
1.
Jenkins J, ODwyer P . Inguinal hernias. BMJ. 2008; 336(7638):269-72. PMC: 2223000. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39450.428275.AD. View

2.
Gass M, Banz V, Rosella L, Adamina M, Candinas D, Guller U . TAPP or TEP? Population-based analysis of prospective data on 4,552 patients undergoing endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. World J Surg. 2012; 36(12):2782-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1760-4. View

3.
Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, Wayand W . Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 1996; 83(11):1563-6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800831124. View

4.
Bittner R, Montgomery M, Arregui E, Bansal V, Bingener J, Bisgaard T . Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society). Surg Endosc. 2014; 29(2):289-321. PMC: 4293469. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3917-8. View

5.
Bittner R, Arregui M, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli G, Fitzgibbons R . Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25(9):2773-843. PMC: 3160575. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1799-6. View