The Relationship Between Duration of Infertility and Clinical Outcomes of Intrauterine Insemination for Younger Women: a Retrospective Clinical Study

Overview

Journal BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Mar 15

PMID 38486148

Authors

Chenyang Huang

Qingqing Shi

Jun Xing

Yuan Yan

Xiaoyue Shen

Huizhi Shan

Haixiang Sun

Jie Mei

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this research was to elucidate the association between the length of infertility and the outcomes of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women of varying ages - a topic that has been the subject of investigation for numerous years, yet lacks a definitive consensus.

Methods: A retrospective cohort investigation involving 5268 IUI cycles was undertaken at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from 2016 to 2022. Utilizing the smooth fitting curve along with threshold and saturation effect analysis, the correlation between infertility duration and IUI clinical pregnancy rates was discerned. Moreover, patients were bifurcated into two cohorts based on their respective infertility durations. A secondary examination was also performed employing propensity-score matching to mitigate the impact of confounding variables. Subsequent threshold and saturation effect analysis was carried out across various subgroups, segmented on the basis of age differentiation.

Results: When the duration of infertility was more than 5 years, the clinical pregnancy rate decreased with the increase of infertility duration (aOR: 0.894, 95%CI: 0.817-0.991, p = 0.043). The multivariate regression analysis suggested that longer duration of infertility (≥ 5 years) was significantly correlated with the lower clinical pregnancy rate (aOR: 0.782, 95% CI: 0.643-0.950, p = 0.01). After the propensity-score matching, the clinical pregnancy rate of women with longer infertility duration were also higher. When the duration of infertility was more than 5 years, the clinical pregnancy rate of women younger than 35 years old decreased with the increase of infertility duration (aOR: 0.906, 95%CI: 0.800-0.998, p = 0.043).

Conclusions: The clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate of IUI in young women (< 35 years old) who have been infertile for more than 5 years significantly decrease with the prolongation of infertility time. Therefore, for young women who have been infertile for more than 5 years, IUI may not be the best choice.

Citing Articles

The association between female age and pregnancy outcomes in patients receiving first elective single embryo transfer cycle: a retrospective cohort study.

Wang X, Tian P, Zhao Y, Lu J, Dong C, Zhang C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19216.

PMID: 39160203 PMC: 11333704. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70249-1.

References

Speyer B, Abramov B, Saab W, Doshi A, Sarna U, Harper J . Factors influencing the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI): age, clinical variables and significant thresholds. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013; 33(7):697-700. DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2013.810199. View

. Evidence-based treatments for couples with unexplained infertility: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(2):305-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.10.014. View

Ashrafi M, Rashidi M, Ghasemi A, Arabipoor A, Daghighi S, Pourasghari P . The role of infertility etiology in success rate of intrauterine insemination cycles: an evaluation of predictive factors for pregnancy rate. Int J Fertil Steril. 2014; 7(2):100-7. PMC: 3850345. View

Gunn D, Bates G . Evidence-based approach to unexplained infertility: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105(6):1566-1574.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.001. View

Zhang K, Shi Y, Wang E, Wang L, Hu Q, Dai Y . Ovarian stimulated cycle: not a better alternative for women without ovulation disorder in intrauterine insemination. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(59):100773-100780. PMC: 5725063. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22052. View

Vitagliano A, Saccardi C, Noventa M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Lagana A, Litta P . Does endometrial scratching really improve intrauterine insemination outcome? Injury timing can make a huge difference. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017; 47(1):33-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.11.001. View

Huntriss J, Picton H . Epigenetic consequences of assisted reproduction and infertility on the human preimplantation embryo. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008; 11(2):85-94. DOI: 10.1080/14647270802116250. View

Yavuz A, Demirci O, Sozen H, Uludogan M . Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014; 11(3):227-34. PMC: 3943223. View

Sexty R, Hamadneh J, Rosner S, Strowitzki T, Ditzen B, Toth B . Cross-cultural comparison of fertility specific quality of life in German, Hungarian and Jordanian couples attending a fertility center. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016; 14:27. PMC: 4765134. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0429-3. View

10.

Sharma A, Shrivastava D . Psychological Problems Related to Infertility. Cureus. 2022; 14(10):e30320. PMC: 9661871. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30320. View

11.

Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H . Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(3):698-703. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.3.698. View

12.

Vargas-Tominaga L, Alarcon F, Vargas A, Bernal G, Medina A, Polo Z . Associated factors to pregnancy in intrauterine insemination. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019; 24(1):66-69. PMC: 6993163. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190060. View

13.

Vitagliano A, Noventa M, Saccone G, Gizzo S, Vitale S, Lagana A . Endometrial scratch injury before intrauterine insemination: is it time to re-evaluate its value? Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2017; 109(1):84-96.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.021. View

14.

Kamel R . Management of the infertile couple: an evidence-based protocol. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010; 8:21. PMC: 2844387. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-21. View

15.

OBrien Y, Ryan M, Martyn F, Wingfield M . A retrospective study of the effect of increasing age on success rates of assisted reproductive technology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017; 138(1):42-46. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12156. View

16.

S Tay P, Raj V, Kulenthran A, Sitizawiah O . Prognostic factors influencing pregnancy rate after stimulated intrauterine insemination. Med J Malaysia. 2008; 62(4):286-9. View

17.

Guzick D, Carson S, Coutifaris C, Overstreet J, Factor-Litvak P, Steinkampf M . Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility. National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340(3):177-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199901213400302. View

18.

Guan H, Tang H, Pan L, Song H, Tang L . Pregnancy predictors in unexplained infertility after intrauterine insemination. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021; 50(8):102071. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102071. View

19.

Kamath M, Aleyamma T, Chandy A, George K . Aromatase inhibitors in women with clomiphene citrate resistance: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(7):2857-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.008. View

20.

Hansen K, He A, Styer A, Wild R, Butts S, Engmann L . Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2016; 105(6):1575-1583.e2. PMC: 4893990. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.020. View