» Articles » PMID: 38483744

Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiome in Pangasionodon Hypopthalmus and Labeo Catla During Health and Disease

Overview
Journal Int Microbiol
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Mar 14
PMID 38483744
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was conducted to study the composition of gut microbiome in the advanced fingerling and fingerling stage of striped pangasius catfish and catla during healthy and diseased conditions. Healthy pangasius and catla fishes were obtained from commercial farms and injected with the LD dose of A. hydrophila. The intestinal samples from the control and injected group were collected and pooled for 16 s metagenomic analysis. Community analysis was performed by targeting the 16 s rRNA gene to explore and compare the gut microbiota composition of these fishes. The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) consisted of four major phyla: Bacteroidia, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Alpha and beta diversity indices were carried out to understand the diversity of microbes within and between a sample. While comparing the advanced fingerling and fingerling stage gut microbiome of Pangasius catfish, the dominance of Proteobacteria was found in fingerlings, whereas Firmicutes and Bacteroides were found in advanced fingerlings. In catla, Proteobacteria and Bacteroides were predominant. Taxonomic abundance of the microbiota in control and diseased Pangasius and catla fishes at phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species levels were also depicted. The present study is the first of its kind, and it will help to identify the diversity of novel potential bacterial species involved in disease protection of fishes. It can lead to the development of sustainable prophylactic measures against (re-)emerging bacterial diseases in aquaculture.

Citing Articles

Comparative studies on the intestinal health of wild and cultured ricefield eel ().

Yang H, Yuan Q, Rahman M, Lv W, Huang W, Hu W Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1411544.

PMID: 38915412 PMC: 11194362. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1411544.

References
1.
Bass D, Stentiford G, Wang H, Koskella B, Tyler C . The Pathobiome in Animal and Plant Diseases. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019; 34(11):996-1008. PMC: 7479508. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.012. View

2.
Burgos F, Ray C, Arias C . Bacterial diversity and community structure of the intestinal microbiome of Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) during ontogenesis. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2018; 41(5):494-505. DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2018.04.006. View

3.
Colin Y, Molbert N, Berthe T, Agostini S, Alliot F, Decenciere B . Dysbiosis of fish gut microbiota is associated with helminths parasitism rather than exposure to PAHs at environmentally relevant concentrations. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):11084. PMC: 9246949. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15010-2. View

4.
Das S, Ward L, Burke C . Prospects of using marine actinobacteria as probiotics in aquaculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008; 81(3):419-29. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-008-1731-8. View

5.
Dehler C, Secombes C, Martin S . Environmental and physiological factors shape the gut microbiota of Atlantic salmon parr ( L.). Aquaculture. 2017; 467:149-157. PMC: 5142738. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.07.017. View