» Articles » PMID: 38481083

Serum Neurofilament Light for Detecting Disease Activity in Individual Patients in Multiple Sclerosis: A 48-week Prospective Single-center Study

Overview
Journal Mult Scler
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Mar 14
PMID 38481083
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) reflects neuroaxonal damage and is now used as an outcome in treatment trials of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, the diagnostic properties of sNfL for monitoring disease activity in individual patients warrant further investigations.

Method: Patients with suspected relapse and/or contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) were consecutively included and performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain at baseline and weeks 28 and 48. Serum was obtained at baseline and 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 weeks. Neurofilament light concentration was measured using Single molecule array technology.

Results: We included 44 patients, 40 with RRMS and 4 with clinically isolated syndrome. The median sNfL level peaked at 2 weeks post-baseline (14.6 ng/L, interquartile range (IQR); 9.3-31.6) and reached nadir at 48 weeks (9.1 ng/L, IQR; 5.5-15.0), equivalent to the median sNfL of controls (9.1 ng/L, IQR; 7.4-12). A baseline -score of more than 1.1 (area under the curve; 0.78, < 0.0001) had a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 70% to detect disease activity.

Conclusion: One out of five patients with relapse and/or CELs did not change significantly in post-baseline sNfL levels. The utility of repeated sNfL measurements to monitor disease activity is complementary rather than a substitute for clinical and MRI measures.

Citing Articles

Impact of serum neurofilament light on clinical decisions in a tertiary multiple sclerosis clinic.

van Lierop Z, Wessels M, Lekranty W, Moraal B, Hof S, Hogenboom L Mult Scler. 2024; 30(13):1620-1629.

PMID: 39420574 PMC: 11568682. DOI: 10.1177/13524585241277044.


Real-World Study of Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Ocrelizumab-Treated People with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

Barrero Hernandez F, Romero Villarrubia A, Munoz Fernandez C, Guillen Martinez V, Aguilera Del Moral A, Barrios-Lopez J J Pers Med. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39063946 PMC: 11277843. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14070692.

References
1.
Benkert P, Meier S, Schaedelin S, Manouchehrinia A, Yaldizli O, Maceski A . Serum neurofilament light chain for individual prognostication of disease activity in people with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective modelling and validation study. Lancet Neurol. 2022; 21(3):246-257. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00009-6. View

2.
Malmestrom C, Haghighi S, Rosengren L, Andersen O, Lycke J . Neurofilament light protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biological markers in MS. Neurology. 2003; 61(12):1720-5. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000098880.19793.b6. View

3.
Rosso M, Gonzalez C, Healy B, Saxena S, Paul A, Bjornevik K . Temporal association of sNfL and gad-enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020; 7(6):945-955. PMC: 7318095. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51060. View

4.
Lycke J, Karlsson J, Andersen O, Rosengren L . Neurofilament protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a potential marker of activity in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998; 64(3):402-4. PMC: 2170011. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.64.3.402. View

5.
Polman C, Reingold S, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen J, Filippi M . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011; 69(2):292-302. PMC: 3084507. DOI: 10.1002/ana.22366. View