» Articles » PMID: 38480533

Assessment of Bone Regeneration After Maxillary Radicular Cyst Enucleation with or Without Bone Grafting Materials: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Mar 14
PMID 38480533
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The limitations of spontaneous bone healing underscore the necessity for exploring alternative strategies to enhance bone regeneration in maxillary radicular cyst cases. This retrospective study aimed to assess the impact of a bone substitute material (i.e., Bio-Oss) on bone volume regeneration following maxillary radicular cyst enucleation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials And Methods: Seventy-three patients with maxillary radicular cysts were divided into two groups: one undergoing guided bone regeneration (GBR) with Bio-Oss and absorbable collagen membrane (n = 35), and the other receiving cyst excision alone (n = 38). Volumetric measurements using Amira software on CBCT scans evaluated bone regeneration, with cystic lesion shrinkage rates calculated. Intergroup comparisons utilized independent sample t-tests (P < 0.05), and linear regression analysis assessed the influence of preoperative cyst volume and group on bone healing.

Results: Both groups showed similar success rates in bone formation at the 12-month follow-up, with no significant differences between them (mean (SD), control: 75.16 (19.17) vs. GBR: 82 (20.22), P > 0.05). Linear regression analysis revealed a negative correlation between preoperative cyst volume and bone regeneration in both groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Bio-Oss may not significantly enhance bone augmentation in maxillary radicular cysts. In addition, preoperative cyst volume negatively affected the shrinkage rate of cystic lesions.

Clinical Relevance: Clinicians should consider patient-specific factors such as anatomy and lesion size when determining the need for bone substitute materials. Future research could focus on optimizing treatment protocols and alternative regenerative strategies to improve patient outcomes in maxillary cyst cases.

References
1.
Santosh A . Odontogenic Cysts. Dent Clin North Am. 2019; 64(1):105-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2019.08.002. View

2.
Barrios-Garay K, Agudelo-Sanchez L, Aguirre-Urizar J, Gay-Escoda C . Critical assessment of the latest classification of jaw cysts proposed by the World Health Organization (2017). J Clin Exp Dent. 2021; 13(11):e1147-e1153. PMC: 8601698. DOI: 10.4317/jced.58764. View

3.
Elhakim A, Kim S, Kim E, Elshazli A . Preserving the vitality of teeth adjacent to a large radicular cyst in periapical microsurgery: a case report with 4-year follow-up. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):382. PMC: 8336380. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01738-2. View

4.
Caliskan M, Kaval M, Tekin U, Unal T . Radiographic and histological evaluation of persistent periapical lesions associated with endodontic failures after apical microsurgery. Int Endod J. 2015; 49(11):1011-1019. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12554. View

5.
Johnson N, Savage N, Kazoullis S, Batstone M . A prospective epidemiological study for odontogenic and non-odontogenic lesions of the maxilla and mandible in Queensland. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 115(4):515-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.01.016. View