» Articles » PMID: 38478077

Gestational Diabetes Perception Profiles Based on Attachment Style: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal Acta Diabetol
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38478077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Gestational diabetes (GDM) is a prevalent complication in pregnancy that requires effective self-management, which can be influenced by illness perceptions. Moreover, behavioral regulation can be affected by attachment styles. Thus, our study aimed to identify common GDM perception profiles and test their association with attachment styles.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 446 women completed the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), and additional items about GDM diagnosis, information, competence, adherence, behavioral change. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to determine GDM perception profiles. Multinomial logistic regression followed to calculate the association between GDM perception profiles and attachment styles.

Results: Three distinct profiles emerged: coping (n = 172, 38.6%)-characterized by the most positive GDM perception, burdened (n = 222, 49.8%)-indicating the emotional burden of the disease, and resourceless (n = 52, 11.7%)-reporting lack of resources (i.e. information, competence). Women with insecure attachment styles were more likely to develop a burdened GDM perception profile. Specifically, the expression of a fearful (OR = 1.184 [95%CI: 1.03; 1.36], p = 0.016) and a preoccupied (OR = 1.154 [95%CI: 1.01; 1.32], p = 0.037) attachment style increased the likelihood for a burdened perception profile, while a secure attachment style (OR = 10.791 [95%CI: 0.65; 0.96], p = 0.017) decreased likelihood for developing resourceless GDM perception profile.

Conclusions: Three GDM perception profiles were identified and the role of attachment styles in shaping these perceptions was confirmed. Further studies are needed to investigate whether a tailored treatment approach based on the predominant attachment style could lead to more positive GDM perceptions, improved glycemic control, and better perinatal outcomes.

References
1.
Metzger B, Lowe L, Dyer A, Trimble E, Chaovarindr U, Coustan D . Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(19):1991-2002. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943. View

2.
Hagger M, Orbell S . The common sense model of illness self-regulation: a conceptual review and proposed extended model. Health Psychol Rev. 2021; 16(3):347-377. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1878050. View

3.
Johnson S . Latent profile transition analyses and growth mixture models: A very non-technical guide for researchers in child and adolescent development. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2021; 2021(175):111-139. DOI: 10.1002/cad.20398. View

4.
Metzger B, Gabbe S, Persson B, Buchanan T, Catalano P, Damm P . International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(3):676-82. PMC: 2827530. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1848. View

5.
Zhu Y, Zhang C . Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes and Risk of Progression to Type 2 Diabetes: a Global Perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 2016; 16(1):7. PMC: 6675405. DOI: 10.1007/s11892-015-0699-x. View