» Articles » PMID: 38478020

Validation of the Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) in a UK Patient Population and Comparison with NELA Scoring: a Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38478020
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Accurate risk scoring in emergency general surgery (EGS) is vital for consent and resource allocation. The emergency surgery score (ESS) has been validated as a reliable preoperative predictor of postoperative outcomes in EGS but has been studied only in the US population. Our primary aim was to perform an external validation study of the ESS in a UK population. Our secondary aim was to compare the accuracy of ESS and National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) scores.

Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study of adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy over three years in two UK centres. ESS was calculated retrospectively. NELA scores and all other variables were obtained from the prospectively collected Emergency Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Scottish Audit (ELLSA) database. The primary and secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respectively.

Results: A total of 609 patients were included. Median age was 65 years, 52.7% were female, the overall mortality was 9.9% and 23.8% were admitted to ICU. Both ESS and NELA were equally accurate in predicting 30-day mortality (c-statistic=0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-0.85) for ESS and c-statistic=0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.88) for NELA, =0.196) and predicting postoperative ICU admission (c-statistic=0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.81) for ESS and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85) for NELA, =0.092).

Conclusions: In the UK population, ESS and NELA both predict 30-day mortality and ICU admission with no statistically significant difference but with higher c-statistics for NELA score. Both scores have certain advantages, with ESS being validated for a wider range of outcomes.

Citing Articles

Safety and efficacy of prophylactic onlay resorbable synthetic mesh with a comprehensive wound bundle at laparotomy closure in high-risk emergency abdominal surgery: an observational study.

Kelly E, Lloyd A, Alsaadi D, Stephens I, Sugrue M World J Emerg Surg. 2025; 20(1):18.

PMID: 40050993 PMC: 11884156. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-025-00579-6.

References
1.
AlSowaiegh R, Naar L, Mokhtari A, Parks J, Fawley J, Mendoza A . Does the Emergency Surgery Score predict failure to discharge the patient home? A nationwide analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020; 90(3):471-476. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002980. View

2.
Gaitanidis A, Mikdad S, Breen K, Kongkaewpaisan N, Mendoza A, Saillant N . The Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) accurately predicts outcomes in elderly patients undergoing emergency general surgery. Am J Surg. 2020; 220(4):1052-1057. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.017. View

3.
Bohnen J, Ramly E, Sangji N, de Moya M, Yeh D, Lee J . Perioperative risk factors impact outcomes in emergency versus nonemergency surgery differently: Time to separate our national risk-adjustment models?. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 81(1):122-30. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001015. View

4.
Kongkaewpaisan N, El Hechi M, Naar L, Kaafarani H . Unplanned readmission after emergency laparotomy: A post hoc analysis of an EAST multicenter study. Surgery. 2021; 169(6):1434-1440. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.047. View

5.
Ingraham A, Cohen M, Bilimoria K, Feinglass J, Richards K, Hall B . Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210(2):155-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.016. View