» Articles » PMID: 38477976

Inhibitory Control Training for Anxiety and Math Achievement in Primary School Children: Protocol for a Proof-of-Concept Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Res Protoc
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38477976
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cognitive control training (CCT) has shown potential to reduce emotional vulnerability in adults and adolescents. However, there is scant literature testing the efficacy of CCT for the reduction of anxiety and transferring the effects to educational outcomes in children. Building on the evidence that a greater ability to suppress a prepotent response (inhibitory control) is associated with higher math achievement in children, it is plausible that training inhibitory processes using a CCT paradigm may be beneficial for reducing anxiety, improving inhibitory control, and in turn increasing math achievement.

Objective: This proof-of-concept study aims to investigate the efficacy of 15 sessions of inhibitory control training for reduction in anxiety and improvement in math achievement in primary school children.

Methods: We will use a 2 (group: CCT, adaptive Go/No-Go vs active control, low-load task) multiplied by 4 (time: pre- vs posttraining vs 1-month vs 3-month follow-up) randomized design in a nonselected sample of 100 children aged 8-10 years. Both groups will complete 10 minutes of daily training for 3 weeks at school. The dependent variables will be anxiety and correlates (Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children, Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale, Child Response Style Questionnaire, and Modified Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale), inhibitory control (Go/No-Go task), shifting (color-shape shifting task), updating (n-back task), and math achievement (Applied Problems, Calculation, and Math Facts Fluency subtests from the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement).

Results: We opened enrollment in September 2023. The initial results are expected to be published in late 2024. We predict that children in the CCT group will show a reduction in emotional symptoms; improvements in inhibition, shifting, and updating performance; and advances in math achievement from pre- to posttraining, and that these effects will be maintained at 1- and 3-month follow-ups, compared to children in the active control group.

Conclusions: The CCT paradigm used in our study will provide a greater understanding of the emotional and cognitive transfer effects on children and inform future work. Specifically, the findings will advance the knowledge of deploying inhibitory control training with children and provide valuable insights into its use for reducing anxiety and advancing math achievement.

Trial Registration: Open Science Framework ofs.io/de2qa; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DE2QA.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/52929.

References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Schweizer S, Samimi Z, Hasani J, Moradi A, Mirdoraghi F, Khaleghi M . Improving cognitive control in adolescents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Behav Res Ther. 2017; 93:88-94. PMC: 5408907. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.03.017. View

3.
Racine N, McArthur B, Cooke J, Eirich R, Zhu J, Madigan S . Global Prevalence of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Children and Adolescents During COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021; 175(11):1142-1150. PMC: 8353576. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2482. View

4.
Boschloo A, Krabbendam L, Aben A, de Groot R, Jolles J . Sorting Test, Tower Test, and BRIEF-SR do not predict school performance of healthy adolescents in preuniversity education. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:287. PMC: 3986566. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00287. View

5.
Koster E, Hoorelbeke K, Onraedt T, Owens M, Derakshan N . Cognitive control interventions for depression: A systematic review of findings from training studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017; 53:79-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.02.002. View