» Articles » PMID: 38477751

Equivalence Trial of Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar GP2411 and Reference Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: the ROSALIA Study

Abstract

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Citing Articles

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of HLX14 versus reference denosumab in healthy males: A randomized phase I study.

Li N, Chu N, Zhu L, Wu X, Wei Q, Wang J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 17(12):e70089.

PMID: 39700054 PMC: 11657593. DOI: 10.1111/cts.70089.

References
1.
Weise M, Bielsky M, De Smet K, Ehmann F, Ekman N, Giezen T . Biosimilars: what clinicians should know. Blood. 2012; 120(26):5111-7. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-425744. View

2.
Zheng J, Van Schaick E, Wu L, Jacqmin P, Perez Ruixo J . Using early biomarker data to predict long-term bone mineral density: application of semi-mechanistic bone cycle model on denosumab data. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015; 42(4):333-47. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-015-9422-4. View

3.
Kvien T, Patel K, Strand V . The cost savings of biosimilars can help increase patient access and lift the financial burden of health care systems. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022; 52:151939. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.11.009. View

4.
Moore T, Mouslim M, Blunt J, Alexander G, Shermock K . Assessment of Availability, Clinical Testing, and US Food and Drug Administration Review of Biosimilar Biologic Products. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 181(1):52-60. PMC: 7536628. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3997. View

5.
Sutjandra L, Rodriguez R, Doshi S, Ma M, Peterson M, Jang G . Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of denosumab in healthy subjects and postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011; 50(12):793-807. DOI: 10.2165/11594240-000000000-00000. View