» Articles » PMID: 38476065

Association of Malnutrition Status with 30-day Mortality in Patients with Sepsis Using Objective Nutritional Indices: a Multicenter Retrospective Study in South Korea

Overview
Journal Acute Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38476065
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) have emerged as important nutritional indices because they provide an objective assessment based on data. We aimed to investigate how these nutritional indices relate to outcomes in patients with sepsis.

Methods: Data were collected retrospectively at five hospitals for patients aged ≥18 years receiving treatment for sepsis between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. Serum albumin and total cholesterol concentrations, and peripheral lymphocytes were used to calculate the CONUT score and PNI. To identify predictors correlated with 30-day mortality, analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: The 30-day mortality rate among 9,763 patients was 15.8% (n=1,546). The median CONUT score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-7) and the median PNI score was 39.6 (IQR, 33.846.4). Higher 30-day mortality rates were associated with individuals with moderate (CONUT score: 5-8; PNI: 35-38) or severe (CONUT: 9-12; PNI: <35) malnutrition compared with those with no malnutrition (CONUT: 0-1; PNI: >38). With CONUT scores, the hazard ratio (HR) associated with moderate malnutrition was 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.87; P<0.001); for severe, HR=2.42 (95% CI, 1.95-3.02; P<0.001). With PNI scores, the HR for moderate malnutrition was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.09-1.53; P=0.003); for severe, HR=1.88 (95% CI, 1.67-2.12; P<0.001).

Conclusions: The nutritional indices CONUT score and PNI showed significant associations with mortality of sepsis patients within 30 days.

Citing Articles

Relationship between the geriatric nutritional risk index and sepsis in elderly critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Jin Y, Zhou T, Hou C, Zhang H, Xu B Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):130.

PMID: 39994820 PMC: 11849206. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-02389-7.


Development and validation of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality from perioperative bacteremia in gastrointestinal surgery.

Taki Y, Sato S, Watanabe M, Ohata K, Kanemoto H, Oba N Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024; 43(11):2117-2126.

PMID: 39225769 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-024-04926-4.

References
1.
Gul B, Metintas S, Ak G, Yilmaz S, Metintas M . The relationship between nutritional status and prognosis in patients with locally advanced and advanced stage lung cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2020; 29(6):3357-3365. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05856-5. View

2.
Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801-10. PMC: 4968574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. View

3.
Ardehali S, Eslamian G, Malek S . Associations between systemic inflammation and intestinal permeability with Onodera's prognostic nutritional index in critically ill patients. Acute Crit Care. 2021; 36(4):361-368. PMC: 8907464. DOI: 10.4266/acc.2021.00178. View

4.
Wang Z, Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhang T . Pretreatment prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic factor in lung cancer: Review and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2018; 486:303-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.030. View

5.
Elke G, Hartl W, Kreymann K, Adolph M, Felbinger T, Graf T . Clinical Nutrition in Critical Care Medicine - Guideline of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine (DGEM). Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019; 33:220-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.05.002. View