» Articles » PMID: 38476062

The Impact of Ketamine on Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Acute Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38476062
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of ketamine in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library; the search was performed initially in January but was repeated in December of 2023. We focused on ICU patients of any age. We included studies that compared ketamine with other traditional agents used in the ICU. We synthesized evidence using RevMan v5.4 and presented the results as forest plots. We also used trial sequential analysis (TSA) software v. 0.9.5.10 Beta and presented results as TSA plots. For synthesizing results, we used a random-effects model and reported differences in outcomes of two groups in terms of mean difference (MD), standardized MD, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB tool for RCTs. Our outcomes were mortality, pain, opioid and midazolam requirements, delirium rates, and ICU length of stay.

Results: Twelve RCTs involving 805 ICU patients (ketamine group, n=398; control group, n=407) were included in the meta-analysis. The ketamine group was not superior to the control group in terms of mortality (in five studies with 318 patients), pain (two studies with 129 patients), mean and cumulative opioid consumption (six studies with 494 patients), midazolam consumption (six studies with 304 patients), and ICU length of stay (three studies with 270 patients). However, the model favored the ketamine group over the control group in delirium rate (four studies with 358 patients). This result is significant in terms of conventional boundaries (alpha=5%) but is not robust in sequential analysis. The applicability of the findings is limited by the small number of patients pooled for each outcome.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis did not demonstrate differences between ketamine and control groups regarding any outcome except delirium rate, where the model favored the ketamine group over the control group. However, this result is not robust as sensitivity analysis and trial sequential analysis suggest that more RCTs should be conducted in the future.

Citing Articles

Opioid-Free Using Ketamine versus Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia during the Intraoperative Period in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Choi H, Huh J, Kim M, Moon S, Kim K, Hwang W J Pers Med. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39202072 PMC: 11355072. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080881.


Ketamine sedation in critically ill patients: Past, present and future.

Sharif S, Prakash J, Rochwerg B Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(8):674-676.

PMID: 39176115 PMC: 11338373. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_519_24.

References
1.
Anwar S, Cooper J, Rahman J, Sharma C, Langford R . Prolonged Perioperative Use of Pregabalin and Ketamine to Prevent Persistent Pain after Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019; 131(1):119-131. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002751. View

2.
Kang H . Trial sequential analysis: novel approach for meta-analysis. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021; 16(2):138-150. PMC: 8107247. DOI: 10.17085/apm.21038. View

3.
Castellini G, Bruschettini M, Gianola S, Gluud C, Moja L . Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis. Syst Rev. 2018; 7(1):110. PMC: 6064621. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0770-1. View

4.
Christ G, Mundigler G, Merhaut C, Zehetgruber M, Kratochwill C, Heinz G . Adverse cardiovascular effects of ketamine infusion in patients with catecholamine-dependent heart failure. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1997; 25(3):255-9. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9702500308. View

5.
Bourgoin A, Albanese J, Wereszczynski N, Charbit M, Vialet R, Martin C . Safety of sedation with ketamine in severe head injury patients: comparison with sufentanil. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(3):711-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000044505.24727.16. View