Experiences and Concerns of Parents of Children with a 16p11.2 Deletion or Duplication Diagnosis: a Reflexive Thematic Analysis

Overview

Journal BMC Psychol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Psychology

Date 2024 Mar 13

PMID 38475925

Authors

Charlotte E Butter

Caitlin L Goldie

Jessica H Hall

Kathy Leadbitter

Emma M M Burkitt

Marianne B M van den Bree

Jonathan M Green

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: 16p11.2 proximal deletion and duplication syndromes (Break points 4-5) (593KB, Chr16; 29.6-30.2mb - HG38) are observed to have highly varied phenotypes, with a known propensity for lifelong psychiatric problems. This study aimed to contribute to a research gap by qualitatively exploring the challenges families with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication face by answering three research questions: (1) What are parents' perceptions of the ongoing support needs of families with children who have 16p11.2 living in the UK?; (2) What are their experiences in trying to access support?; (3) In these regards, do the experiences of parents of children with duplication converge or vary from those of parents of children with 16p11.2 deletion?

Methods: 33 parents with children (aged 7-17 years) with 16p11.2 deletion or duplication participated in structured interviews, including the Autism Diagnostic Interview- Revised (ADI-R). Their answers to the ADI-R question 'what are your current concerns' were transcribed and subsequently analysed using Braun and Clarke's six step reflexive thematic analysis framework.

Results: Three themes were identified: (1) Child is Behind Peers (subthemes: developmentally; academically; socially; emotionally); (2) Metabolism and Eating Patterns and; (3) Support (subthemes: insufficient support available; parent has to fight to access support; COVID-19 was a barrier to accessing support; 16p11.2 diagnosis can be a barrier to support, child is well-supported).

Conclusions: Parents of children with either 16p11.2 deletion or duplication shared similar experiences. However, metabolism concerns were specific to parents of children with 16p11.2 deletion. The theme Child is Behind Peers echoed concerns raised in previous Neurodevelopmental Copy Number Variant research. However, there were some key subthemes relating to research question (2) which were specific to this study. This included parents' descriptions of diagnostic overshadowing and the impact of a lack of eponymous name and scant awareness of 16p11.2.

Citing Articles

Current research status and progress in neuropsychological development of children with congenital heart disease: A review.

Lin S, Su X, Cao D Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(44):e40489.

PMID: 39495978 PMC: 11537670. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040489.

The pleiotropic spectrum of proximal 16p11.2 CNVs.

Auwerx C, Kutalik Z, Reymond A Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(11):2309-2346.

PMID: 39332410 PMC: 11568765. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.08.015.

References

Vo O, McNeill A, Vogt K . The psychosocial impact of 22q11 deletion syndrome on patients and families: A systematic review. Am J Med Genet A. 2018; 176(10):2215-2225. PMC: 6221171. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38673. View

Reiss S, Levitan G, SZYSZKO J . Emotional disturbance and mental retardation: diagnostic overshadowing. Am J Ment Defic. 1982; 86(6):567-74. View

Chawner S, Doherty J, Anney R, Antshel K, Bearden C, Bernier R . A Genetics-First Approach to Dissecting the Heterogeneity of Autism: Phenotypic Comparison of Autism Risk Copy Number Variants. Am J Psychiatry. 2021; 178(1):77-86. PMC: 8022239. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20010015. View

Maillard A, Hippolyte L, Rodriguez-Herreros B, Chawner S, Dremmel D, Aguera Z . 16p11.2 Locus modulates response to satiety before the onset of obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015; 40(5):870-6. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2015.247. View

Jacquemont S, Reymond A, Zufferey F, Harewood L, Walters R, Kutalik Z . Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature. 2011; 478(7367):97-102. PMC: 3637175. DOI: 10.1038/nature10406. View

Jones S, Howard L, Thornicroft G . 'Diagnostic overshadowing': worse physical health care for people with mental illness. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008; 118(3):169-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01211.x. View

van den Bree M, Miller G, Mansell E, Thapar A, Flinter F, Owen M . The internet is parents' main source of information about psychiatric manifestations of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS). Eur J Med Genet. 2013; 56(8):439-41. PMC: 3744815. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.05.001. View

DAngelo D, Lebon S, Chen Q, Martin-Brevet S, Snyder L, Hippolyte L . Defining the Effect of the 16p11.2 Duplication on Cognition, Behavior, and Medical Comorbidities. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015; 73(1):20-30. PMC: 5894477. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2123. View

Fernandez B, Roberts W, Chung B, Weksberg R, Meyn S, Szatmari P . Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J Med Genet. 2009; 47(3):195-203. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2009.069369. View

10.

Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A . Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: a revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994; 24(5):659-85. DOI: 10.1007/BF02172145. View

11.

Morrow E . Genomic copy number variation in disorders of cognitive development. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49(11):1091-104. PMC: 3137887. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.009. View

12.

Jacquemont S, Huguet G, Klein M, Chawner S, Donald K, van den Bree M . Genes To Mental Health (G2MH): A Framework to Map the Combined Effects of Rare and Common Variants on Dimensions of Cognition and Psychopathology. Am J Psychiatry. 2022; 179(3):189-203. PMC: 9345000. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21040432. View

13.

Coe B, Witherspoon K, Rosenfeld J, van Bon B, Vulto-van Silfhout A, Bosco P . Refining analyses of copy number variation identifies specific genes associated with developmental delay. Nat Genet. 2014; 46(10):1063-71. PMC: 4177294. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3092. View

14.

Kleinendorst L, van den Heuvel L, Henneman L, van Haelst M . Who ever heard of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome? Parents' perspectives on a susceptibility copy number variation syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020; 28(9):1196-1204. PMC: 7608422. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0644-6. View

15.

Wu Y, Al-Janabi H, Mallett A, Quinlan C, Scheffer I, Howell K . Parental health spillover effects of paediatric rare genetic conditions. Qual Life Res. 2020; 29(9):2445-2454. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02497-3. View

16.

FitzGerald J, Wilson C, Kelly C, Gallagher L . 'More than a box of puzzles': Understanding the parental experience of having a child with a rare genetic condition". Eur J Med Genet. 2021; 64(4):104164. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104164. View

17.

Niarchou M, Cunningham A, Chawner S, Moulding H, Sopp M, Hall J . Psychopathology in mothers of children with pathogenic Copy Number Variants. J Med Genet. 2022; 60(7):706-711. PMC: 10359584. DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108752. View

18.

Angkustsiri K, Leckliter I, Tartaglia N, Beaton E, Enriquez J, Simon T . An examination of the relationship of anxiety and intelligence to adaptive functioning in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2012; 33(9):713-20. PMC: 3523689. DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318272dd24. View

19.

Rosenfeld J, Coppinger J, Bejjani B, Girirajan S, Eichler E, Shaffer L . Speech delays and behavioral problems are the predominant features in individuals with developmental delays and 16p11.2 microdeletions and microduplications. J Neurodev Disord. 2011; 2(1):26-38. PMC: 3125720. DOI: 10.1007/s11689-009-9037-4. View

20.

Yu Y, Zhu H, Miller D, Gusella J, Platt O, Wu B . Age- and gender-dependent obesity in individuals with 16p11.2 deletion. J Genet Genomics. 2011; 38(9):403-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2011.08.003. View