» Articles » PMID: 38475061

Missing Data Statistics Provide Causal Insights into Data Loss in Diabetes Health Monitoring by Wearable Sensors

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38475061
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Data loss in wearable sensors is an inevitable problem that leads to misrepresentation during diabetes health monitoring. We systematically investigated missing wearable sensors data to get causal insight into the mechanisms leading to missing data.

Methods: Two-week-long data from a continuous glucose monitor and a Fitbit activity tracker recording heart rate (HR) and step count in free-living patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were used. The gap size distribution was fitted with a Planck distribution to test for missing not at random (MNAR) and a difference between distributions was tested with a Chi-squared test. Significant missing data dispersion over time was tested with the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn post hoc analysis.

Results: Data from 77 subjects resulted in 73 cleaned glucose, 70 HR and 68 step count recordings. The glucose gap sizes followed a Planck distribution. HR and step count gap frequency differed significantly ( < 0.001), and the missing data were therefore MNAR. In glucose, more missing data were found in the night (23:00-01:00), and in step count, more at measurement days 6 and 7 ( < 0.001). In both cases, missing data were caused by insufficient frequency of data synchronization.

Conclusions: Our novel approach of investigating missing data statistics revealed the mechanisms for missing data in Fitbit and CGM data.

Citing Articles

Participant-Centered Engagement for Sustained Adherence to Smartwatches: A 12-Month Prospective Decentralized Digital Health Study.

Wilton A, Saliba C, Marrero-Polanco J, Sheffield K, Wilkes Q, Anacker M Clin Transl Sci. 2025; 18(2):e70155.

PMID: 39954233 PMC: 11829698. DOI: 10.1111/cts.70155.


Consequences of Data Loss on Clinical Decision-Making in Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Retrospective Cohort Study.

den Braber N, Braem C, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, Hermens H, Urgert T, Yavuz U Interact J Med Res. 2024; 13:e50849.

PMID: 39083801 PMC: 11325125. DOI: 10.2196/50849.

References
1.
den Braber N, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, Oosterwijk M, Gant C, Hagedoorn I, van Beijnum B . Requirements of an Application to Monitor Diet, Physical Activity and Glucose Values in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The Diameter. Nutrients. 2019; 11(2). PMC: 6413029. DOI: 10.3390/nu11020409. View

2.
Akturk H, Herrero P, Oliver N, Wise H, Eikermann E, Snell-Bergeon J . Impact of Different Types of Data Loss on Optimal Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sampling Duration. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022; 24(10):749-753. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0093. View

3.
ElSayed N, Aleppo G, Aroda V, Bannuru R, Brown F, Bruemmer D . 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2022; 46(Suppl 1):S97-S110. PMC: 9810469. DOI: 10.2337/dc23-S006. View

4.
Matlary R, Holme P, Glosli H, Rueegg C, Grydeland M . Comparison of free-living physical activity measurements between ActiGraph GT3X-BT and Fitbit Charge 3 in young people with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2022; 28(6):e172-e180. PMC: 9796296. DOI: 10.1111/hae.14624. View

5.
Orstad S, Gerchow L, Patel N, Reddy M, Hernandez C, Wilson D . Defining Valid Activity Monitor Data: A Multimethod Analysis of Weight-Loss Intervention Participants' Barriers to Wear and First 100 Days of Physical Activity. Informatics (MDPI). 2022; 8(2). PMC: 9754231. DOI: 10.3390/informatics8020039. View