» Articles » PMID: 38473016

Radiographic Imaging for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38473016
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Skeletal Class III malocclusion is one type of dentofacial deformity that significantly affects patients' facial aesthetics and oral health. The orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion presents challenges due to uncertainties surrounding mandibular growth patterns and treatment outcomes. In recent years, disease-specific radiographic features have garnered interest from researchers in various fields including orthodontics, for their exceptional performance in enhancing diagnostic precision and treatment effect predictability. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the valuable radiographic features in the diagnosis and management of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Based on the existing literature, a series of analyses on lateral cephalograms have been concluded to identify the significant variables related to facial type classification, growth prediction, and decision-making for tooth extractions and orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Furthermore, we summarize the parameters regarding the inter-maxillary relationship, as well as different anatomical structures including the maxilla, mandible, craniofacial base, and soft tissues from conventional and machine learning statistical models. Several distinct radiographic features for Class III malocclusion have also been preliminarily observed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Citing Articles

Comparative Analysis of Early Class III Malocclusion Treatments-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Otel A, Montiel-Company J, Zubizarreta-Macho A Children (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40003279 PMC: 11854749. DOI: 10.3390/children12020177.


Feasibility study of low-dose computed tomography (CT) technology for maxillofacial bone three-dimensional (3D) printing in skeletal class III malocclusion.

Miao Q, Li G, Wang Y, Wang J, Wang H, Chen W Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):8238-8248.

PMID: 39698645 PMC: 11651978. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-1266.


Machine Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Class III Malocclusions in Children.

Zhao L, Chen X, Huang J, Mo S, Gu M, Kang N Children (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39062212 PMC: 11274672. DOI: 10.3390/children11070762.

References
1.
Martinez P, Bellot-Arcis C, Llamas J, Cibrian R, Gandia J, Paredes-Gallardo V . Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 46(4):490-495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.12.001. View

2.
Etemad L, Wu T, Heiner P, Liu J, Lee S, Chao W . Machine learning from clinical data sets of a contemporary decision for orthodontic tooth extraction. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021; 24 Suppl 2:193-200. DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12502. View

3.
Proff P, Will F, Bokan I, Fanghanel J, Gedrange T . Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(3):433-9. DOI: 10.2319/013007-48.1. View

4.
Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Lux C, Schuster G . Treatment decision in adult patients with Class III malocclusion: orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122(1):27-37; discussion 37-8. DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.123632. View

5.
Baik C, Ververidou M . A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126(1):100-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.026. View