» Articles » PMID: 38472235

Classification and Automatic Scoring of Arousal Intensity During Sleep Stages Using Machine Learning

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38472235
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arousal during sleep can result in sleep fragmentation and various physiological effects, impairing cognitive function and raising blood pressure and heart rate. However, the current definition of arousal has limitations in assessing both amplitude and duration, making it challenging to measure sleep fragmentation accurately. Moreover, there is inconsistency among inter-raters in arousal scoring, which renders it susceptible to subjective variability. Therefore, this study aims to identify a highly accurate classifier for each sleep stage by employing optimized feature selection and machine learning models. According to electroencephalography (EEG) signals during the arousal phase, the intensity level was categorized into four levels. For control, the non-arousal cases were used as level 0 and referred as sham arousal, resulting in five arousal intensity levels. Wavelet transform was applied to analyze sleep arousal to extract features from EEG. Based on these features, we classified arousal intensity levels through machine learning algorithms. Due to the different characteristics of EEG in each sleep stage, the classification model was optimized for the four sleep stages. Excluding sham arousals, a total of 13,532 arousal events were used. The lowest intensity in the entire data, level 1, was computed to be 3107, level 2 was 3384, level 3 was 3472, and the highest intensity of level 4 was 3,569. The optimized classification model for each sleep stage achieved an average sensitivity of 82.68%, specificity of 95.68%, and AUROC of 96.30%. The sensitivity of the control, arousal intensity level 0, was 83.07%, a 1.25% increase over the unoptimized model and a 14.22% increase over previous research. This study used machine learning techniques to develop classifiers for each sleep stage, improving the accuracy of arousal intensity classification. The classifiers showed high sensitivity and specificity and revealed the unique characteristics of arousal intensity during different sleep stages. These findings represent a novel approach to arousal research and have implications for developing more accurate predictive models in sleep research.

References
1.
Hosseini M, Hosseini A, Ahi K . A Review on Machine Learning for EEG Signal Processing in Bioengineering. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2020; 14:204-218. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2020.2969915. View

2.
Adeli H, Zhou Z, Dadmehr N . Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform. J Neurosci Methods. 2003; 123(1):69-87. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(02)00340-0. View

3.
Lee J, Kim D, Kim I, Park K, Kim S . Nonlinear-analysis of human sleep EEG using detrended fluctuation analysis. Med Eng Phys. 2004; 26(9):773-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.07.002. View

4.
Fietze I, Hansch T, Rottig J, Baumann G, Witt C . Arousals and sleep stages in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: Changes under nCPAP treatment. J Sleep Res. 1997; 6(2):128-33. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1997.00029.x. View

5.
Engleman H, Kingshott R, Martin S, Douglas N . Cognitive function in the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS). Sleep. 2000; 23 Suppl 4:S102-8. View