» Articles » PMID: 38471102

Familial Adversity: Association with Discontinuation of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer Prognosis

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Mar 12
PMID 38471102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many studies have examined patient-related factors affecting adjuvant hormone therapy adherence in patients with breast cancer. Our study aimed to examine associations of family-related factors with adjuvant hormone therapy discontinuation and breast cancer-specific mortality.

Methods: By cross-linking 7 Swedish health registers, we performed a cohort study that included all patients with breast cancer who initiated adjuvant hormone therapy during 2006-2019 in Sweden (N = 10 701). A group-based multitrajectory model was used to identify familial adversity groups based on 3 dimensions: material deprivation, negative family dynamics, and loss or threat of loss. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate associations of familial adversity with hormone therapy discontinuation and breast cancer-specific mortality.

Results: We identified 5 distinctive familial adversity groups among the cohort participants. Compared with women who had low familial adversity, higher risks to discontinue adjuvant hormone therapy were observed among women with material deprivation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20 to 1.43), negative family dynamics (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.28), loss or threat of loss (HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.32), or high familial adversity (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.40 to 1.68). Furthermore, women with material deprivation (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.79), negative family dynamics (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.97), or high adversity (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.26 to 2.23) were at higher risk of dying from breast cancer.

Conclusion: Familial adversity is associated with a higher risk of adjuvant hormone therapy discontinuation and breast cancer-specific mortality. Family-related factors identified in our study may help identify high-risk patients for interventions to prevent treatment discontinuation and subsequently improve breast cancer outcomes.

References
1.
Ludvigsson J, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson B, Ekbom A . The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009; 24(11):659-67. PMC: 2773709. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y. View

2.
Brito C, Portela M, de Vasconcellos M . Adherence to hormone therapy among women with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:397. PMC: 4057651. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-397. View

3.
Wigertz A, Ahlgren J, Holmqvist M, Fornander T, Adolfsson J, Lindman H . Adherence and discontinuation of adjuvant hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 133(1):367-73. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1961-4. View

4.
Allison K, Hammond M, Dowsett M, McKernin S, Carey L, Fitzgibbons P . Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38(12):1346-1366. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02309. View

5.
. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005; 365(9472):1687-717. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0. View