» Articles » PMID: 38469460

Heritability of Recapping Behavior and Suppressed Mite Reproduction As Resistance Traits Towards

Overview
Date 2024 Mar 12
PMID 38469460
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The selection of honeybee strains resistant to the ectoparasitic mite is generally considered as one of the most sustainable ways of coping with this major bee parasite. Thus, breeding efforts increasingly focus on resistance parameters in addition to common beekeeping traits like honey yield and gentleness. In every breeding effort, the success strongly depends on the quantifiability and heritability of the traits accounted. To find the most suitable traits among the manifold variants to assess resistance, it is necessary to evaluate how easily a trait can be measured (i.e., testing effort) in relation to the underlying heritability (i.e., expected transfer to the following generation). Various possible selection traits are described as beneficial for colony survival in the presence of and therefore are measured in breeding stocks around the globe. Two of them in particular, suppressed mite reproduction (SMR, any reproductive failure of mother mites) and recapping of already sealed brood cells have recently gained increasing attention among the breeders because they closely resemble resistance mechanisms of some -surviving honeybee populations. However, it was still unknown whether the genetic background of the trait is sufficient for targeted selection. We therefore investigated the heritabilities and genetic correlations for SMR and REC, distinguishing between recapping of infested cells (RECinf) and all cells (RECall), on an extensive dataset of Buckfast and Carniolan stock in Germany. With an accessible h² of 0.18 and 0.44 for SMR and an accessible h² of 0.44 and 0.40 for RECinf, both traits turned out to be very promising for further selection in the Buckfast and Carnica breeding population, respectively.

Citing Articles

Sequence-Based Multi Ancestry Association Study Reveals the Polygenic Architecture of Varroa destructor Resistance in the Honeybee Apis mellifera.

Eynard S, Mondet F, Basso B, Bouchez O, Conte Y, Dainat B Mol Ecol. 2024; 34(3):e17637.

PMID: 39737798 PMC: 11754705. DOI: 10.1111/mec.17637.


The number of drones to inseminate a queen with has little potential for optimization of honeybee breeding programs.

Du M, Bernstein R, Hoppe A Hereditas. 2024; 161(1):28.

PMID: 39192380 PMC: 11348579. DOI: 10.1186/s41065-024-00332-0.


Comprehensive Approach to Phenotype Reproduction in Honey Bee Drone Brood and Its Correlation with Decreased Mite Reproduction (DMR).

Lefebre R, Claeys Bouuaert D, Bossuyt E, Smet L, Brunain M, Danneels E Insects. 2024; 15(6).

PMID: 38921112 PMC: 11203922. DOI: 10.3390/insects15060397.


Mite non-reproduction is not a consequence of the brood removal behavior of varroa sensitive hygiene honey bee colonies ().

Sprau L, Traynor K, Gessler B, Hasselmann M, Rosenkranz P Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(6):e11595.

PMID: 38919649 PMC: 11199085. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11595.


Population-wide modelling reveals prospects of marker-assisted selection for parasitic mite resistance in honey bees.

Lefebre R, Broeckx B, Smet L, Peelman L, de Graaf D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7866.

PMID: 38570723 PMC: 10991324. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58596-5.


References
1.
Conte Y, Meixner M, Brandt A, Carreck N, Costa C, Mondet F . Geographical Distribution and Selection of European Honey Bees Resistant to . Insects. 2020; 11(12). PMC: 7764010. DOI: 10.3390/insects11120873. View

2.
Grindrod I, Martin S . Parallel evolution of resistance in honey bees: a common mechanism across continents?. Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1956):20211375. PMC: 8334839. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1375. View

3.
Eynard S, Sann C, Basso B, Guirao A, Conte Y, Servin B . Descriptive Analysis of the Varroa Non-Reproduction Trait in Honey Bee Colonies and Association with Other Traits Related to Varroa Resistance. Insects. 2020; 11(8). PMC: 7469219. DOI: 10.3390/insects11080492. View

4.
Wilfert L, Long G, Leggett H, Schmid-Hempel P, Butlin R, Martin S . Deformed wing virus is a recent global epidemic in honeybees driven by Varroa mites. Science. 2016; 351(6273):594-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.aac9976. View

5.
Oddie M, Buchler R, Dahle B, Kovacic M, Conte Y, Locke B . Rapid parallel evolution overcomes global honey bee parasite. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):7704. PMC: 5955925. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26001-7. View