» Articles » PMID: 38467898

Developing a Decision Aid for Clinical Obesity Services in the Real World: the DACOS Nationwide Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Obes Surg
Date 2024 Mar 12
PMID 38467898
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop a decision aid tool using "real-world" data within the Australian health system to predict weight loss after bariatric surgery and non-surgical care.

Materials And Methods: We analyzed patient record data (aged 16+years) from initial review between 2015 and 2020 with 6-month (n=219) and 9-/12-month (n=153) follow-ups at eight clinical obesity services. Primary outcome was percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 6 months and 9/12 months. Predictors were selected by statistical evidence (p<0.20), effect size (±2%), and clinical judgment. Multiple linear regression and bariatric surgery were used to create simple predictive models. Accuracy was measured using percentage of predictions within 5% of the observed value, and sensitivity and specificity for predicting target weight loss of 5% (non-surgical care) and 15% (bariatric surgery).

Results: Observed %TWL with bariatric surgery vs. non-surgical care was 19% vs. 5% at 6 months and 22% vs. 5% at 9/12 months. Predictors at 6 months with intercept (non-surgical care) of 6% include bariatric surgery (+11%), BMI>60 (-3%), depression (-2%), anxiety (-2%), and eating disorder (-2%). Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 58%, 69%, and 56%. Predictors at 9/12 months with intercept of 5% include bariatric surgery (+15%), type 2 diabetes (+5%), eating disorder (+4%), fatty liver (+2%), atrial fibrillation (-4%), osteoarthritis (-3%), sleep/mental disorders (-2-3%), and ≥10 alcohol drinks/week (-2%). Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 55%, 86%, and 53%.

Conclusion: Clinicians may use DACOS to discuss potential weight loss predictors with patients after surgery or non-surgical care.

References
1.
Kassel L, Berei J, Pitlick J, Rand J . Insulin Dose Adjustment Following Bariatric Surgery, a Review of Available Literature. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021; 16(6):1560-1566. PMC: 9631544. DOI: 10.1177/19322968211028886. View

2.
Chao A, Wadden T, Tronieri J, Berkowitz R . Alcohol Intake and Weight Loss During Intensive Lifestyle Intervention for Adults with Overweight or Obesity and Diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018; 27(1):30-40. PMC: 6309276. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22316. View

3.
Sharman M, Hensher M, Wilkinson S, Campbell J, Venn A . Review of Publicly-Funded Bariatric Surgery Policy in Australia-Lessons for More Comprehensive Policy Making. Obes Surg. 2015; 26(4):817-24. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1806-4. View

4.
Nordmo M, Danielsen Y, Nordmo M . The challenge of keeping it off, a descriptive systematic review of high-quality, follow-up studies of obesity treatments. Obes Rev. 2019; 21(1):e12949. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12949. View

5.
Atlantis E, Kormas N, Samaras K, Fahey P, Sumithran P, Glastras S . Clinical Obesity Services in Public Hospitals in Australia: a position statement based on expert consensus. Clin Obes. 2018; 8(3):203-210. DOI: 10.1111/cob.12249. View