» Articles » PMID: 38467894

Computed Tomography-based Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Therapeutic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer : A Scale for Treatment Predicting

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Mar 12
PMID 38467894
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in various responses when used to treat locally advanced gastric cancer, we aimed to develop and validate a predictive model of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: A total of 128 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scanning followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included (training cohort: n = 64; validation cohort: n = 64). We built a radiomics score combined with laboratory parameters to create a nomogram for predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and calculating scores for risk factors.

Results: The radiomics score system demonstrated good stability and prediction performance for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with the area under the curve of the training and validation cohorts being 0.8 and 0.64, respectively. The radiomics score proved to be an independent risk factor affecting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition to the radiomics score, four other risk factors were included in the nomogram, namely the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, total bilirubin, ALT/AST, and CA199. The model had a C-index of 0.8.

Conclusions: Our results indicated that radiomics features could be potential biomarkers for the early prediction of the response to neoadjuvant treatment.

Citing Articles

Application and progress of nomograms in gastric cancer.

Wang H, Ding Y, Zhuang M, Li K, Zhao S, Li D Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1510742.

PMID: 39944483 PMC: 11813919. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1510742.

References
1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

2.
Imamura H, Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, Fujita J, Miyashiro I . Morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructive procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2012; 36(3):632-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1408-9. View

3.
Takahashi T, Saikawa Y, Kitagawa Y . Gastric cancer: current status of diagnosis and treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2013; 5(1):48-63. PMC: 3730304. DOI: 10.3390/cancers5010048. View

4.
Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon J, Conroy T, Bouche O, Lebreton G . Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(13):1715-21. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0597. View

5.
Aoyama T, Nishikawa K, Fujitani K, Tanabe K, Ito S, Matsui T . Early results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(8):1876-1881. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx236. View