» Articles » PMID: 38465870

The Dynamics of Locomotor Neuromuscular Fatigue During Ramp-Incremental Cycling to Intolerance

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Mar 11
PMID 38465870
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Traditional neuromuscular fatigue assessments are not task-specific and are unable to characterize neuromuscular performance decline during dynamic whole-body exercise. This study used interleaved maximal isokinetic cycling efforts to characterize the dynamics of the decline in neuromuscular performance during ramp-incremental (RI) cycle ergometry exercise to intolerance.

Methods: Eleven young healthy participants (10 male/1 female) performed two RI cycle ergometry exercise tests to intolerance: 1) RI exercise with peak isokinetic power (Piso) at 80 rpm measured at baseline and immediately at intolerance from a maximal ~6 s effort, and 2) RI exercise where additional Piso measurements were interleaved every 90 s to characterize the decline in neuromuscular performance during the RI test. Muscle excitation was measured using EMG during all Piso assessments, and pulmonary gas exchange was measured throughout.

Results: Baseline Piso was 832 ± 140 W and RI exercise reduced Piso to 349 ± 96 W at intolerance ( P = 0.001), which was not different from flywheel power at intolerance (303 ± 96 W; P = 0.292). There was no reduction in Piso between baseline cycling and gas exchange threshold (GET; baseline Piso vs mean Piso below GET: 828 ± 146 vs 815 ± 149 W; P = 1.00). Piso fell progressively above GET until intolerance (Piso every 90 s above GET: 759 ± 139, 684 ± 141, 535 ± 144, 374 ± 117 W; each P < 0.05 vs baseline and mean Piso below GET). Peak muscle excitation (EMG) was also reduced only above GET (73% ± 14% of baseline, at intolerance; P < 0.05). However, the reduction in peak Piso preceded the reduction in peak muscle excitation.

Conclusions: The dynamics of the decline in neuromuscular performance (reduction in Piso and EMG) during RI exercise are consistent with known intensity-dependent metabolic and traditional pre-post neuromuscular fatigue responses to discrete bouts of constant-power exercise.

References
1.
Jones A, Wilkerson D, DiMenna F, Fulford J, Poole D . Muscle metabolic responses to exercise above and below the "critical power" assessed using 31P-MRS. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007; 294(2):R585-93. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00731.2007. View

2.
Sargeant A, Dolan P . Effect of prior exercise on maximal short-term power output in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987; 63(4):1475-80. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.4.1475. View

3.
Azevedo R, Forot J, Iannetta D, Aboodarda S, Millet G, Murias J . Time Course of Performance Fatigability during Exercise below, at, and above the Critical Intensity in Females and Males. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022; 54(10):1665-1677. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002957. View

4.
Poole D, Ward S, GARDNER G, Whipp B . Metabolic and respiratory profile of the upper limit for prolonged exercise in man. Ergonomics. 1988; 31(9):1265-79. DOI: 10.1080/00140138808966766. View

5.
Goulding R, Rossiter H, Marwood S, Ferguson C . Bioenergetic Mechanisms Linking V˙O2 Kinetics and Exercise Tolerance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2021; 49(4):274-283. PMC: 8528340. DOI: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000267. View