[Imaginology in the Diagnosis and Planning of Root Duct Systems: an Updated Review]

Overview

Journal Rev Cient Odontol (Lima)

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2024 Mar 11

PMID 38464410

Authors

Crismely Taveras Parra

Gustavo Adolfo Fiori-Chincaro

Ana Maria Agudelo-Botero

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Root canal systems present a varied morphological conformation for each group of teeth. Several authors have described the anatomical conformation and its variants in different classifications, including the main, collateral, lateral, secondary, accessory, interduct, recurrent, apical delta and interradicular cavus canals. Currently, radiology still does not allow visualization of all these structures. However, proper use of imaging techniques together with the use of new 3D equipment for adjustments of acquisition parameters with adequate software and algorithms allows greater image precision, facilitating diagnosis and the planning of the most adequate approach for endodontic treatments. The objective of this article was to conduct a review of the literature to identify new concepts and useful imaging tools for better diagnoses.

References

Campello A, Goncalves L, Ribeiro Guedes F, Marques F . Cone-beam computed tomography versus digital periapical radiography in the detection of artificially created periapical lesions: A pilot study of the diagnostic accuracy of endodontists using both techniques. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017; 47(1):25-31. PMC: 5370254. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2017.47.1.25. View

Shokri A, Ramezani L, Bidgoli M, Akbarzadeh M, Ghazikhanlu-Sani K, Fallahi-Sichani H . Effect of field-of-view size on gray values derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with the Hounsfield unit values from multidetector computed tomography scans. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018; 48(1):31-39. PMC: 5863017. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2018.48.1.31. View

Takeshita W, Chicarelli M, Vessoni Iwaki L . Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of root perforation, external resorption and fractures using cone-beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography and conventional & digital periapical radiography. Indian J Dent Res. 2016; 26(6):619-26. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.176927. View

Patel S . New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2009; 42(6):463-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01531.x. View

Mashyakhy M, Chourasia H, Halboub E, Almashraqi A, Khubrani Y, Gambarini G . Anatomical variations and bilateral symmetry of roots and root canal system of mandibular first permanent molars in Saudi Arabian population utilizing cone- beam computed tomography. Saudi Dent J. 2019; 31(4):481-486. PMC: 6823797. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.04.001. View

Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F, Wilson R, Pitt Ford T . Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. Int Endod J. 2009; 42(6):507-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01538.x. View

Zhao J, Li Y, Yang Z, Wang W, Meng Y . Three-dimensional computed topography analysis of a patient with an unusual anatomy of the maxillary second and third molars. Int J Oral Sci. 2011; 3(4):225-8. PMC: 3469980. DOI: 10.4248/IJOS11078. View

Scarfe W, Farman A . What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?. Dent Clin North Am. 2008; 52(4):707-30, v. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005. View

Nascimento E, Abrahao Elias M, Vasconcelos V, Haiter-Neto F, Mendonca E, Sousa T . Ex Vivo Detection of Apical Delta in Premolars: A Comparative Study Using Periapical Radiography, Cone-beam Computed Tomography, and Micro-computed Tomography. J Endod. 2019; 45(5):549-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.02.022. View

10.

Mayo Jr C, Replogle K, Marshall J, Best A, Sehgal H, Sousa Melo S . Accuracy of Presurgical Limited Field of View Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Predicting Intraoperative Buccal Cortical Bone. J Endod. 2019; 46(2):169-177.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.026. View

11.

Sousa T, Haiter-Neto F, Nascimento E, Peroni L, Freitas D, Hassan B . Diagnostic Accuracy of Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Identifying Root Canal Configuration of Human Premolars. J Endod. 2017; 43(7):1176-1179. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.021. View

12.

Ariji Y, Ariji E, Nakashima M, Iohara K . Magnetic resonance imaging in endodontics: a literature review. Oral Radiol. 2018; 34(1):10-16. DOI: 10.1007/s11282-017-0301-0. View

13.

Wolf T, Paque F, Sven Patyna M, Willershausen B, Briseno-Marroquin B . Three-dimensional analysis of the physiological foramen geometry of maxillary and mandibular molars by means of micro-CT. Int J Oral Sci. 2017; 9(3):151-157. PMC: 5709546. DOI: 10.1038/ijos.2017.29. View

14.

Chogle S, Zuaitar M, Sarkis R, Saadoun M, Mecham A, Zhao Y . The Recommendation of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Its Effect on Endodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. J Endod. 2019; 46(2):162-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.034. View

15.

. AAE and AAOMR Issue Position Statement on 3-D Imaging in Endodontics. Dent Today. 2015; 34(8):46. View

16.

Al-Salehi S, Horner K . Impact of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) on diagnostic thinking in endodontics of posterior teeth: A before- after study. J Dent. 2016; 53:57-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.012. View

17.

Salineiro F, Kobayashi-Velasco S, Braga M, Gusmao Paraiso Cavalcanti M . Radiographic diagnosis of root fractures: a systematic review, meta-analyses and sources of heterogeneity. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017; 46(8):20170400. PMC: 5965946. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170400. View

18.

KUTTLER Y . Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1955; 50(5):544-52. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1955.0099. View

19.

Gambarini G, Piasecki L, Ropini P, Miccoli G, Di Nardo D, Testarelli L . Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis on root and canal morphology of mandibular first permanent molar among multiracial population in Western European population. Eur J Dent. 2018; 12(3):434-438. PMC: 6089042. DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_116_18. View

20.

Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer P . Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2010; 44(2):162-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01826.x. View