» Articles » PMID: 38461280

Evaluation of Dispensaries' Cannabis Flowers for Accuracy of Labeling of Cannabinoids Content

Overview
Journal J Cannabis Res
Date 2024 Mar 9
PMID 38461280
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cannabis policies have changed drastically over the last few years with many states enacting medical cannabis laws, and some authorizing recreational use; all against federal laws. As a result, cannabis products are marketed in dispensaries in different forms, most abundantly as flowers intended for smoking and sometimes vaping. All samples used in this study were obtained directly from law enforcement. The sample collection process was facilitated and funded by the National Marijuana Initiative (NMI), part of the High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) program. This initial report focuses on cannabis flowers. Similar studies with other cannabis products will be the subject of a future report.

Methods: A total of 107 Δ-THC cannabis flower samples were collected by law enforcement from adult commercial use cannabis dispensaries, located in three different states (Colorado, Oregon, and California) and analyzed in this study for cannabinoid concentration. Samples were analyzed by GC-FID following our previously published procedure.

Discussion: The label claims for total Δ-THC content ranged from 12.04 to 58.20% w/w, while GC-FID results showed a concentration ranging from 12.95 to 36.55% w/w. Of the evaluated 107 products, only 32 samples have Δ-THC content within ± 20% of the labeled content. However, the remaining 75 samples were found to be out of the ± 20% acceptance criteria. The degree of agreement for the tested samples using ± 20% tolerance with label claims was only 30%. The results of this study indicate that there is a need for more stringent regulations to ensure that product labeling is accurate, as 70% of the evaluated products did not meet the ± 20% acceptance criteria. This highlights the importance of healthcare professionals and patients being vigilant about the Δ-THC content, as inaccurate labeling of cannabis products could potentially result in adverse health effects. Furthermore, there is a pressing need for more rigorous regulation of commercial cannabis products in the United States.

Citing Articles

Research and Clinical Practice Involving the Use of Products, with Emphasis on Cannabidiol: A Narrative Review.

Simei J, Souza J, Pedrazzi J, Guimaraes F, Campos A, Zuardi A Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 17(12.

PMID: 39770486 PMC: 11677192. DOI: 10.3390/ph17121644.


Correction: Competing Interests.

J Cannabis Res. 2025; 7(1):2.

PMID: 39757241 PMC: 11702173. DOI: 10.1186/s42238-024-00254-8.


Using Cannabis and CBD to Sleep: An Updated Review.

Lavender I, Garden G, Grunstein R, Yee B, Hoyos C Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024; 26(12):712-727.

PMID: 39612156 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-024-01564-7.


A multi-market comparison of composition, formulation, and label content of CBD e-liquids.

Hoeng J, Latino D, Schlage W, Mazurov A, Sherwood N, McKinney W iScience. 2024; 27(11):111154.

PMID: 39524363 PMC: 11550624. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111154.


Effectiveness and safety of cannabis-based products for medical use in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: A systematic review.

Lopera V, Restrepo J, Amariles P Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024; 16:100524.

PMID: 39498228 PMC: 11533093. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100524.


References
1.
Liebling J, Clarkson N, Gibbs B, Yates A, OSullivan S . An Analysis of Over-the-Counter Cannabidiol Products in the United Kingdom. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021; 7(2):207-213. PMC: 9070743. DOI: 10.1089/can.2019.0078. View

2.
Vandrey R, Raber J, Raber M, Douglass B, Miller C, Bonn-Miller M . Cannabinoid Dose and Label Accuracy in Edible Medical Cannabis Products. JAMA. 2015; 313(24):2491-3. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.6613. View

3.
Spindle T, Bonn-Miller M, Vandrey R . Changing landscape of cannabis: novel products, formulations, and methods of administration. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019; 30:98-102. PMC: 7041884. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.04.002. View

4.
Hammond D . Communicating THC levels and 'dose' to consumers: Implications for product labelling and packaging of cannabis products in regulated markets. Int J Drug Policy. 2019; 91:102509. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.004. View

5.
Ahmed S, Ross S, Slade D, Radwan M, Zulfiqar F, Matsumoto R . Cannabinoid ester constituents from high-potency Cannabis sativa. J Nat Prod. 2008; 71(4):536-42. PMC: 4883103. DOI: 10.1021/np070454a. View