» Articles » PMID: 38459220

Evaluation of Stress and Displacement of Maxillary Canine During the Single Canine Retraction in the Maxillary First Premolar Extraction Cases- A Finite Element Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Mar 8
PMID 38459220
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This finite element study aimed to simulate maxillary canine movement during anterior teeth retraction.

Materials And Methods: Three methods of maxillary canine movement including miniscrew sliding with high hooks (MSH), miniscrew sliding with low hooks (MSL), and the traditional sliding method (TS) without using miniscrews were simulated using three-dimensional finite element analysis. The initial displacement of the maxillary canine, the maximum principal stress of the periodontal ligament and the Von Mises stress were calculated.

Results: The distolingual tipping movements of the canine were shown in three movement modes. MSH showed a small tendency to lingual tipping movement and a extrusion movement while MSL had the largest lingual inclination. TS demonstrated a tendency toward distolingual torsion displacement. Compressive stress values were mainly concentrated in the range - 0.003 to -0.006 MPa. For tensile stress, the distribution of MSH and MSL was concentrated in the range 0.005 to 0.009 MPa, TS was mainly distributed about 0.003 MPa. Von Mises equivalent stress distribution showed no significant difference.

Conclusions: The loss of tooth torque was inevitable, irrespective of which method was used to close the extraction space. However, miniscrew application and higher hooks reduced the loss of torque and avoided lingual rotation.

Clinical Relevance: This study shows that miniscrew implants with different hooks can better control the movement of the maxillary canines. The non-invasive nature of the finite element analysis and its good simulation of dental stress and instantaneous motion trend have a clinical advantage in the analysis of tooth movement.

References
1.
Cattaneo P, Cornelis M . Orthodontic Tooth Movement Studied by Finite Element Analysis: an Update. What Can We Learn from These Simulations?. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2021; 19(2):175-181. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-021-00664-0. View

2.
El-Beialy A, El-Ashmawi N, El-Ghafour M . Canine root/cortical bone relation (CRCR) and the orthodontic tooth movement. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):10714. PMC: 9226186. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14663-3. View

3.
Zhang L, Guo R, Xu B, Wang Y, Li W . Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary tooth movement in extraction patients with three different miniscrew anchorage systems: a randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod. 2022; 23(1):46. PMC: 9760583. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-022-00441-4. View

4.
Lei C, Yu Q, Wu D, Cai K, Weigl P, Tang C . Comparison of alveolar bone width and sagittal tooth angulation of maxillary central incisors in Class I and Class III canine relationships: a retrospective study using CBCT. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):303. PMC: 9308311. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02331-x. View

5.
Yassir Y, Nabbat S, McIntyre G, Bearn D . Which anchorage device is the best during retraction of anterior teeth? An overview of systematic reviews. Korean J Orthod. 2022; 52(3):220-235. PMC: 9117787. DOI: 10.4041/kjod21.153. View