» Articles » PMID: 38455329

Development of a Gender Score in a Representative German Population Sample and Its Association with Diverse Social Positions

Overview
Journal Front Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Mar 8
PMID 38455329
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Gender as a relational concept is rarely considered in epidemiology. However, an in-depth reflection on gender conceptualisation and operationalisation can advance gender analysis in quantitative health research, allowing for more valid evidence to support public health interventions. We constructed a context-specific gender score to assess how its discriminatory power differed in sub-groups defined by social positions relevant to intersectional analyses, i.e., sex/gender, race, class, age and sexual attraction.

Methods: We created a gender score with the help of multivariable logistic regression models and conditional probabilities based on gendered social practices and expressed on a masculinity-femininity continuum, using data of the German Socioeconomic Panel. With density plots, we exploratively compared distributions of gendered social practices and their variation across social groups.

Results: We included 13 gender-related variables to define a gender score in our sample ( = 20,767). Variables on family and household structures presented with the highest weight for the gender score. When comparing social groups, we saw that young individuals, those without children, not living with a partner or currently living in a same-sex/gender partnership, showed more overlap between feminine/masculine social practices among females and males.

Conclusions: The distribution of gendered social practices differs among social groups, which empirically backs up the theoretical notion of gender being a context-specific construct. Economic participation and household structures remain essential drivers of heterogeneity in practices among women and men in most social positions. The gender score can be used in epidemiology to support concerted efforts to overcome these gender (in)equalities-which are important determinants of health inequalities.

Citing Articles

Gender scores in epidemiological research: methods, advantages and implications.

Ballering A, Olde Hartman T, Rosmalen J Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024; 43:100962.

PMID: 38989448 PMC: 11233999. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100962.

References
1.
Heise L, Greene M, Opper N, Stavropoulou M, Harper C, Nascimento M . Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. Lancet. 2019; 393(10189):2440-2454. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X. View

2.
Sorlin A, Ohman A, Ng N, Lindholm L . Can the impact of gender equality on health be measured? A cross-sectional study comparing measures based on register data with individual survey-based data. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:795. PMC: 3503856. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-795. View

3.
Killewald A, Garcia-Manglano J . Tethered lives: A couple-based perspective on the consequences of parenthood for time use, occupation, and wages. Soc Sci Res. 2016; 60:266-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.03.007. View

4.
Shah B, Laupacis A, Hux J, Austin P . Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(6):550-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.016. View

5.
Pelletier R, Ditto B, Pilote L . A composite measure of gender and its association with risk factors in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome. Psychosom Med. 2015; 77(5):517-26. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000186. View