» Articles » PMID: 38454329

Genotypic Study of Chlamydia Trachomatis for Lymphogranuloma Venereum Diagnosis in Rectal Specimens from Men Who Have Sex with Men: a Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Infect Dis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Mar 8
PMID 38454329
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The significant proportion of asymptomatic patients and the scarcity of genotypic analysis of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV), mainly among men who have sex with men (MSM), triggers a high incidence of underdiagnosed patients, highlighting the importance of determining the most appropriate strategy for LGV diagnosis, at both clinical and economical levels.

Materials And Methods: We conducted L1-L3 serovar detection by molecular biology in stored Chlamydia trachomatis-positive samples from MSM patients with HIV, another STI or belonging to a Pre-exposure prophylaxis program, to make a cost effectiveness study of four diagnostic strategies with a clinical, molecular, or mixed approach.

Results: A total of 85 exudates were analyzed: 35urethral (31 symptomatic/4 positive) and 50 rectal (22 symptomatic/25 positive), 70/85 belonging to MSM with associated risk factors. The average cost per patient was €77.09 and €159.55 for clinical (Strategy I) and molecular (Strategy IV) strategies respectively. For molecular diagnosis by genotyping of all rectal exudate samples previously positive for CT (Strategy II), the cost was €123.84. For molecular diagnosis by genotyping of rectal and/or urethral exudate samples from all symptomatic patients (proctitis or urethritis) with a previous positive result for CT (Strategy III), the cost was €129.39. The effectiveness ratios were 0.80, 0.95, 0.91, and 1.00 for each strategy respectively. The smallest ICER was €311.67 for Strategy II compared to Strategy I.

Conclusions: With 30% asymptomatic patients, the most cost-effective strategy was based on genotyping all rectal exudates. With less restrictive selection criteria, thus increasing the number of patients with negative results, the most sensitive strategies tend to be the most cost-effective, but with a high incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

References
1.
de Vries H, De Barbeyrac B, de Vrieze N, Viset J, White J, Vall-Mayans M . 2019 European guideline on the management of lymphogranuloma venereum. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019; 33(10):1821-1828. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15729. View

2.
Andronis L, Barton P, Bryan S . Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making. Health Technol Assess. 2009; 13(29):iii, ix-xi, 1-61. DOI: 10.3310/hta13290. View

3.
Saxon C, Hughes G, Ison C . Asymptomatic Lymphogranuloma Venereum in Men who Have Sex with Men, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015; 22(1):112-116. PMC: 4696683. DOI: 10.3201/EID2201.141867. View

4.
Ward H, Alexander S, Carder C, Dean G, French P, Ivens D . The prevalence of lymphogranuloma venereum infection in men who have sex with men: results of a multicentre case finding study. Sex Transm Infect. 2009; 85(3):173-5. PMC: 2683989. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2008.035311. View

5.
Gomersall J, Jadotte Y, Xue Y, Lockwood S, Riddle D, Preda A . Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13(3):170-8. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000063. View