» Articles » PMID: 38452227

Deep Learning-based Segmentation of Computed Tomography Scans Predicts Disease Progression and Mortality in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Abstract

Despite evidence demonstrating a prognostic role for computed tomography (CT) scans in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), image-based biomarkers are not routinely used in clinical practice or trials. To develop automated imaging biomarkers using deep learning-based segmentation of CT scans. We developed segmentation processes for four anatomical biomarkers, which were applied to a unique cohort of treatment-naive patients with IPF enrolled in the PROFILE (Prospective Observation of Fibrosis in the Lung Clinical Endpoints) study and tested against a further United Kingdom cohort. The relationships among CT biomarkers, lung function, disease progression, and mortality were assessed. Data from 446 PROFILE patients were analyzed. Median follow-up duration was 39.1 months (interquartile range, 18.1-66.4 mo), with a cumulative incidence of death of 277 (62.1%) over 5 years. Segmentation was successful on 97.8% of all scans, across multiple imaging vendors, at slice thicknesses of 0.5-5 mm. Of four segmentations, lung volume showed the strongest correlation with FVC ( = 0.82;  < 0.001). Lung, vascular, and fibrosis volumes were consistently associated across cohorts with differential 5-year survival, which persisted after adjustment for baseline gender, age, and physiology score. Lower lung volume (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96-0.99];  = 0.001), increased vascular volume (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.12-1.51];  = 0.001), and increased fibrosis volume (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.12-1.22];  < 0.001) were associated with reduced 2-year progression-free survival in the pooled PROFILE cohort. Longitudinally, decreasing lung volume (HR, 3.41 [95% CI, 1.36-8.54];  = 0.009) and increasing fibrosis volume (HR, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.22-4.08];  = 0.009) were associated with differential survival. Automated models can rapidly segment IPF CT scans, providing prognostic near and long-term information, which could be used in routine clinical practice or as key trial endpoints.

Citing Articles

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Chantzi S, Kosvyra A, Chouvarda I J Imaging Inform Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39762544 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01377-3.


The density histograms-derived computerized integrated index (CII) predicts mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Rea G, Lieto R, Bruzzese D, Iovine P, Mazzocca A, Sanduzzi Zamparelli S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30680.

PMID: 39730381 PMC: 11680894. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77328-3.


Quantitative Computed Tomography in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Is It Time to Act?.

Calandriello L Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024; 210(4):382-383.

PMID: 38625082 PMC: 11351806. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202403-0659ED.

References
1.
Sakai N, Mishima M, Nishimura K, Itoh H, Kuno K . An automated method to assess the distribution of low attenuation areas on chest CT scans in chronic pulmonary emphysema patients. Chest. 1994; 106(5):1319-25. DOI: 10.1378/chest.106.5.1319. View

2.
Fernandez Perez E, Daniels C, Schroeder D, St Sauver J, Hartman T, Bartholmai B . Incidence, prevalence, and clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a population-based study. Chest. 2009; 137(1):129-37. PMC: 2803118. DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-1002. View

3.
Wu X, Kim G, Salisbury M, Barber D, Bartholmai B, Brown K . Computed Tomographic Biomarkers in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. The Future of Quantitative Analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 199(1):12-21. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0444PP. View

4.
Santermans E, Ford P, Kreuter M, Verbruggen N, Meyvisch P, Wuyts W . Modelling Forced Vital Capacity in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Optimising Trial Design. Adv Ther. 2019; 36(11):3059-3070. PMC: 6822798. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-01093-3. View

5.
Humphries S, Thieke D, Baraghoshi D, Strand M, Swigris J, Chae K . Deep Learning Classification of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Predicts Outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024; 209(9):1121-1131. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202307-1191OC. View