» Articles » PMID: 38449937

Personalized Treatment of Recurrent, Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer Guided by Patient-Derived Xenograft Models

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Mar 7
PMID 38449937
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC) is associated with a poor prognosis and short survival duration. There is an urgent need to identify personalized predictors of drug response to guide the selection of the most effective therapy for each individual recurrence. We tested the feasibility of patient-derived xenografts (PDX) for guiding their RMHNSCC salvage treatment. Fresh tumor samples from eligible, consented patients were implanted into mice. Established tumors were expanded in mouse PDX cohorts to identify responses to candidate salvage drug treatments in parallel testing. Patients alive and suitable for chemotherapy were treated based on responses determined by PDX testing. Nine patient tumors were successfully engrafted in mice with an average time of 89.2±41.7 days. Four patients' PDX models underwent parallel drug testing. Two patients received PDX-guided therapy. In one of these patients, single agents of cetuximab and paclitaxel demonstrated the best responses in the PDX model, and this patient exhibited sequential partial responses to each drug, including a 17-month clinical response to cetuximab. The main limitation of PDX testing for RMHNSCC was the time delay in obtaining testing results. Despite this, parallel PDX testing may be feasible for a subset of patients and appears to correlate with clinical benefit.

References
1.
Harrington K, Ferris R, Blumenschein Jr G, Colevas A, Fayette J, Licitra L . Nivolumab versus standard, single-agent therapy of investigator's choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CheckMate 141): health-related quality-of-life results from a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(8):1104-1115. PMC: 6461049. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30421-7. View

2.
Guidi A, Codeca C, Ferrari D . Chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Med Oncol. 2018; 35(3):37. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1096-5. View

3.
Vermorken J, Mesia R, Rivera F, Remenar E, Kawecki A, Rottey S . Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(11):1116-27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802656. View

4.
Burtness B, Harrington K, Greil R, Soulieres D, Tahara M, de Castro Jr G . Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019; 394(10212):1915-1928. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32591-7. View

5.
Zeng P, Cecchini M, Barrett J, Shammas-Toma M, De Cecco L, Serafini M . Immune-based classification of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer with implications for biomarker-driven treatment de-intensification. EBioMedicine. 2022; 86:104373. PMC: 9706534. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104373. View