» Articles » PMID: 38449916

Safety and Immune Responses Following Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody Infusions in Healthy Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Antiretroviral Therapy

Abstract

Background: T cells in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) demonstrate an exhausted phenotype, and HIV-specific CD4 T cells expressing programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) are enriched for latent HIV, making antibody to PD-1 a potential strategy to target the latent reservoir.

Methods: This was a phase 1/2, randomized (4:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with suppressed HIV on antiretroviral therapy with CD4 counts ≥350 cells/μL who received 2 infusions of cemiplimab versus placebo. The primary outcome was safety, defined as any grade 3 or higher adverse event (AE) or any immune-related AE (irAE). Changes in HIV-1-specific polyfunctional CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses were evaluated.

Results: Five men were enrolled (median CD4 count, 911 cells/μL; median age, 51 years); 2 received 1 dose of cemiplimab, 2 received 2 doses, and 1 received placebo. One participant had a probable irAE (thyroiditis, grade 2); another had a possible irAE (hepatitis, grade 3), both after a single low-dose (0.3 mg/kg) infusion. The Safety Monitoring Committee recommended no further enrollment or infusions. All 4 cemiplimab recipients were followed for 48 weeks. No other cemiplimab-related serious AEs, irAEs, or grade 3 or higher AEs occurred. One 2-dose recipient of cemiplimab had a 6.2-fold increase in polyfunctional, Gag-specific CD8 T-cell frequency with supportive increases in plasma HIV RNA and decreases in total HIV DNA.

Conclusions: One of 4 participants exhibited increased HIV-1specific T-cell responses and transiently increased HIV-1 expression following 2 cemiplimab infusions. The occurrence of irAEs after a single, low dose may limit translating the promising therapeutic results of cemiplimab for cancer to immunotherapeutic and latency reversal strategies for HIV. NCT03787095.

Citing Articles

Interventions during Early Infection: Opening a Window for an HIV Cure?.

Hiner C, Mueller A, Su H, Goldstein H Viruses. 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 39459922 PMC: 11512236. DOI: 10.3390/v16101588.


Immune checkpoint inhibitors in infectious disease.

King H, Lewin S Immunol Rev. 2024; 328(1):350-371.

PMID: 39248154 PMC: 11659942. DOI: 10.1111/imr.13388.

References
1.
El Zarif T, Nassar A, Adib E, Fitzgerald B, Huang J, Mouhieddine T . Safety and Activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in People Living With HIV and Cancer: A Real-World Report From the Cancer Therapy Using Checkpoint Inhibitors in People Living With HIV-International (CATCH-IT) Consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(21):3712-3723. PMC: 10351941. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02459. View

2.
Shan L, Deng K, Shroff N, Durand C, Rabi S, Yang H . Stimulation of HIV-1-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes facilitates elimination of latent viral reservoir after virus reactivation. Immunity. 2012; 36(3):491-501. PMC: 3501645. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.01.014. View

3.
Abdel-Wahab N, Shah M, Suarez-Almazor M . Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Case Reports. PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0160221. PMC: 4966895. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160221. View

4.
Lau J, McMahon J, Gubser C, Solomon A, Chiu C, Dantanarayana A . The impact of immune checkpoint therapy on the latent reservoir in HIV-infected individuals with cancer on antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2021; 35(10):1631-1636. PMC: 8286319. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002919. View

5.
Sun C, Mezzadra R, Schumacher T . Regulation and Function of the PD-L1 Checkpoint. Immunity. 2018; 48(3):434-452. PMC: 7116507. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.014. View