» Articles » PMID: 38449611

Non-invasive Diagnosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Current Status and Future Perspective

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Mar 7
PMID 38449611
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease throughout the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis can result from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the severe stage of NAFLD progression. By some estimates, NAFLD affects almost one-third of the world's population, which is completely new and serious public health issue. Unfortunately, NAFLD is diagnosed by exclusion, and the gold standard for identifying NAFLD/NASH and reliably measuring liver fibrosis remains liver biopsy, which is an invasive, costly, time-consuming procedure and involves variable inter-observer diagnosis. With the progress of omics and imaging techniques, numerous non-invasive serological assays have been generated and developed. On the basis of these developments, non-invasive biomarkers and imaging techniques have been combined to increase diagnostic accuracy. This review provides information for the diagnosis and assessment of NAFLD/NASH in clinical practice going forward and may assist the clinician in making an early and accurate diagnosis and in proposing a cost-effective patient surveillance. We discuss newly identified and validated non-invasive diagnostic methods from biopsy-confirmed NAFLD patient studies and their implementation in clinical practice, encompassing NAFLD/NASH diagnosis and differentiation, fibrosis assessment, and disease progression monitoring. A series of tests, including 20-carboxy arachidonic acid (20-COOH AA) and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto prostaglandin D2 (dhk PGD2), were found to be potentially the most accurate non-invasive tests for diagnosing NAFLD. Additionally, the Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D-MRE), combination of the FM-fibro index and Liver stiffness measurement (FM-fibro LSM index) and the machine learning algorithm (MLA) tests are more accurate than other tests in assessing liver fibrosis. However, it is essential to use bigger cohort studies to corroborate a number of non-invasive diagnostic tests with extremely elevated diagnostic values.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic of fatty liver using radiomics and deep learning models on non-contrast abdominal CT.

Zhang H, Liu J, Su D, Bai Z, Wu Y, Ma Y PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0310938.

PMID: 39946425 PMC: 11825062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310938.


Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Tests for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Sun Y, Hu D, Yu M, Liang S, Zheng Y, Wang X Clin Epidemiol. 2025; 17:53-71.

PMID: 39897720 PMC: 11786599. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S501445.


Advancing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prediction: a comprehensive machine learning approach integrating SHAP interpretability and multi-cohort validation.

Yang B, Lu H, Ran Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1450317.

PMID: 39439566 PMC: 11493712. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1450317.


The Metabolomic Footprint of Liver Fibrosis.

Beyoglu D, Popov Y, Idle J Cells. 2024; 13(16.

PMID: 39195223 PMC: 11353060. DOI: 10.3390/cells13161333.


Chinese medicine in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on network pharmacology: a review.

Zheng S, Xue C, Li S, Zao X, Li X, Liu Q Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1381712.

PMID: 38694920 PMC: 11061375. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1381712.


References
1.
Paternostro R, Trauner M . Current treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Intern Med. 2022; 292(2):190-204. PMC: 9546342. DOI: 10.1111/joim.13531. View

2.
Dennis A, Kelly M, Fernandes C, Mouchti S, Fallowfield J, Hirschfield G . Correlations Between MRI Biomarkers PDFF and cT1 With Histopathological Features of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 11:575843. PMC: 7877451. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.575843. View

3.
Cengiz M, Senturk S, Cetin B, Bayrak A, Bilek S . Sonographic assessment of fatty liver: intraobserver and interobserver variability. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 7(12):5453-60. PMC: 4307502. View

4.
Feng G, Zheng K, Li Y, Rios R, Zhu P, Pan X . Machine learning algorithm outperforms fibrosis markers in predicting significant fibrosis in biopsy-confirmed NAFLD. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021; 28(7):593-603. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.972. View

5.
Yip T, Lee H, Chan W, Wong G, Wong V . Asian perspective on NAFLD-associated HCC. J Hepatol. 2021; 76(3):726-734. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.024. View