» Articles » PMID: 38448705

Evaluation the Relationship Between Myocardial Fibrosis and Left Ventricular Torsion Measured by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature-tracking in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Mar 6
PMID 38448705
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The relationship between left ventricular (LV) torsion and myocardial fibrosis (MF) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with preserved ejection fraction was still not well understood. New developments in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) enable a much fuller assessment of cardiac characteristics. This study sought to assess the impact of HCM on myocardial function as assessed by LV torsion and its relationship with MF. HCM (n = 79) and healthy controls (n = 40) underwent CMR. According to whether there was late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), patients were divided into LGE group and LGE group. LV torsion and torsion rate were measured by CMR feature-tracking (CMR-FT). MF was quantitatively evaluated through LGE imaging. LGE was present in 44 patients (56%). Compared with healthy controls, torsion increased in the LGE group (P < 0.001). Compared with LGE group, torsion was higher in the LGE group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in torsion between LGE group and healthy controls. Correlation analysis showed that torsion was correlated with LGE% (r = - 0.443) and LGE mass (r = - 0.435) respectively. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, LV torsion was the only feature that was independently associated with the presence of LGE (OR 0.130; 95% CI 0.040 to 0.420, P = 0.01). The best torsion value associated with MF was 1.91 (sensitivity 60.0%, specificity 77.3%, AUC = 0.733). In HCM patients with preserved ejection fraction, CMR-FT derived LV torsion analysis holds promise for myocardial fibrosis detection.

References
1.
Gersh B, Maron B, Bonow R, Dearani J, Fifer M, Link M . 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011; 124(24):2761-96. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318223e230. View

2.
Maron B, McKenna W, Danielson G, Kappenberger L, Kuhn H, Seidman C . American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the.... Eur Heart J. 2003; 24(21):1965-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00479-2. View

3.
OHanlon R, Grasso A, Roughton M, Moon J, Clark S, Wage R . Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(11):867-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.010. View

4.
Chan R, Maron B, Olivotto I, Pencina M, Assenza G, Haas T . Prognostic value of quantitative contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the evaluation of sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2014; 130(6):484-95. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007094. View

5.
Bruder O, Wagner A, Jensen C, Schneider S, Ong P, Kispert E . Myocardial scar visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts major adverse events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(11):875-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.007. View