» Articles » PMID: 38448509

Biodiversity-production Feedback Effects Lead to Intensification Traps in Agricultural Landscapes

Overview
Journal Nat Ecol Evol
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Mar 6
PMID 38448509
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intensive agriculture with high reliance on pesticides and fertilizers constitutes a major strategy for 'feeding the world'. However, such conventional intensification is linked to diminishing returns and can result in 'intensification traps'-production declines triggered by the negative feedback of biodiversity loss at high input levels. Here we developed a novel framework that accounts for biodiversity feedback on crop yields to evaluate the risk and magnitude of intensification traps. Simulations grounded in systematic literature reviews showed that intensification traps emerge in most landscape types, but to a lesser extent in major cereal production systems. Furthermore, small reductions in maximal production (5-10%) could be frequently transmitted into substantial biodiversity gains, resulting in small-loss large-gain trade-offs prevailing across landscape types. However, sensitivity analyses revealed a strong context dependence of trap emergence, inducing substantial uncertainty in the identification of optimal management at the field scale. Hence, we recommend the development of case-specific safety margins for intensification preventing double losses in biodiversity and food security associated with intensification traps.

Citing Articles

From marginal croplands to natural habitats: A methodological framework for assessing the restoration potential to enhance wild-bee pollination in agricultural landscapes.

Torchio G, Cimon-Morin J, Mendes P, Goyette J, Schwantes A, Arias-Patino M Landsc Ecol. 2024; 39(11):194.

PMID: 39539641 PMC: 11554958. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-024-01993-y.


Are agricultural commodity production systems at risk from local biodiversity loss?.

Maney C, Sassen M, Giller K Biol Lett. 2024; 20(9):20240283.

PMID: 39288815 PMC: 11407868. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0283.


Lessons from Ethiopian coffee landscapes for global conservation in a post-wild world.

Hylander K, Nemomissa S, Fischer J, Zewdie B, Ayalew B, Tack A Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):714.

PMID: 38858451 PMC: 11164958. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06381-5.

References
1.
Diaz S, Settele J, Brondizio E, Ngo H, Agard J, Arneth A . Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science. 2019; 366(6471). DOI: 10.1126/science.aax3100. View

2.
Mason-DCroz D, Bogard J, Sulser T, Cenacchi N, Dunston S, Herrero M . Gaps between fruit and vegetable production, demand, and recommended consumption at global and national levels: an integrated modelling study. Lancet Planet Health. 2019; 3(7):e318-e329. PMC: 6637854. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30095-6. View

3.
Willett W, Rockstrom J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S . Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019; 393(10170):447-492. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. View

4.
Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort B . Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(50):20260-4. PMC: 3250154. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108. View

5.
Ramankutty N, Mehrabi Z, Waha K, Jarvis L, Kremen C, Herrero M . Trends in Global Agricultural Land Use: Implications for Environmental Health and Food Security. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018; 69:789-815. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040256. View