» Articles » PMID: 38445836

Implantable Loop Recorders in Patients with Brugada Syndrome: the BruLoop Study

Abstract

Background And Aims: Available data on continuous rhythm monitoring by implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) are scarce. The aim of this multi-centre study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and clinical implication of a continuous rhythm monitoring strategy by ILRs in a large cohort of BrS patients and to assess the precise arrhythmic cause of syncopal episodes.

Methods: A total of 370 patients with BrS and ILRs (mean age 43.5 ± 15.9, 33.8% female, 74.1% symptomatic) from 18 international centers were included. Patients were followed with continuous rhythm monitoring for a median follow-up of 3 years.

Results: During follow-up, an arrhythmic event was recorded in 30.7% of symptomatic patients [18.6% atrial arrhythmias (AAs), 10.2% bradyarrhythmias (BAs), and 7.3% ventricular arrhythmias (VAs)]. In patients with recurrent syncope, the aetiology was arrhythmic in 22.4% (59.3% BAs, 25.0% VAs, and 15.6% AAs). The ILR led to drug therapy initiation in 11.4%, ablation procedure in 10.9%, implantation of a pacemaker in 2.5%, and a cardioverter-defibrillator in 8%. At multivariate analysis, the presence of symptoms [hazard ratio (HR) 2.5, P = .001] and age >50 years (HR 1.7, P = .016) were independent predictors of arrhythmic events, while inducibility of ventricular fibrillation at the electrophysiological study (HR 9.0, P < .001) was a predictor of VAs.

Conclusions: ILR detects arrhythmic events in nearly 30% of symptomatic BrS patients, leading to appropriate therapy in 70% of them. The most commonly detected arrhythmias are AAs and BAs, while VAs are detected only in 7% of cases. Symptom status can be used to guide ILR implantation.

Citing Articles

Asymptomatic Brugada syndrome: Navigating implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation dilemma.

Lima M, Almeida A, Matos D, Cavaco D, Adragao P HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2025; 10(12):941-945.

PMID: 39897681 PMC: 11781890. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.09.008.


Increased pacemaker implantation and mortality rates in relatives of patients with early-onset sinus node dysfunction: can genetics explain all?.

Conte G Europace. 2024; 26(12).

PMID: 39533833 PMC: 11630514. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae289.


aTrial arrhythmias in inhEriTed aRrhythmIa Syndromes: results from the TETRIS study.

Conte G, Bergonti M, Probst V, Morita H, Tfelt-Hansen J, Behr E Europace. 2024; 26(12).

PMID: 39527076 PMC: 11630530. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae288.

References
1.
Mascia G, Della Bona R, Ameri P, Canepa M, Porto I, Parati G . Brugada syndrome and syncope: a practical approach for diagnosis and treatment. Europace. 2020; 23(7):996-1002. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa370. View

2.
Scrocco C, Ben-Haim Y, Devine B, Tome-Esteban M, Papadakis M, Sharma S . Role of subcutaneous implantable loop recorder for the diagnosis of arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome: A United Kingdom single-center experience. Heart Rhythm. 2021; 19(1):70-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.034. View

3.
Sacher F, Arsac F, Wilton S, Derval N, Denis A, de Guillebon M . Syncope in Brugada syndrome patients: prevalence, characteristics, and outcome. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9(8):1272-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.013. View

4.
Probst V, Veltmann C, Eckardt L, Meregalli P, Gaita F, Tan H . Long-term prognosis of patients diagnosed with Brugada syndrome: Results from the FINGER Brugada Syndrome Registry. Circulation. 2010; 121(5):635-43. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.887026. View

5.
Hamilton G, ODonnell D, Han H . Brugada syndrome and undifferentiated syncope: use of an implantable loop recorder to document causation. Med J Aust. 2018; 209(3):113-114. DOI: 10.5694/mja17.01117. View