» Articles » PMID: 38444764

Effects of Low-load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction on Muscle Fiber Myofibrillar and Extracellular Area

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2024 Mar 6
PMID 38444764
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Blood flow restriction applied during low-load resistance training (LL-BFR) induces a similar increase in the cross-sectional area of muscle fibers (fCSA) compared to traditional high-load resistance training (HL-RT). However, it is unclear whether LL-BFR leads to differential changes in myofibrillar spacing in muscle fibers and/or extracellular area compared to HL-RT. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the hypertrophy of type I and II fibers induced by LL-BFR or HL-RT is accompanied by differential changes in myofibrillar and non-myofibrillar areas. In addition, we examined if extracellular spacing was differentially affected between these two training protocols. Twenty recreationally active participants were assigned to LL-BFR or HL-RT groups and underwent a 6-week training program. Muscle biopsies were taken before and after the training period. The fCSA of type I and II fibers, the area occupied by myofibrillar and non-myofibrillar components, and extracellular spacing were analyzed using immunohistochemistry techniques. Despite the significant increase in type II and mean (type I + II) fCSA ( < 0.05), there were no significant changes in the proportionality of the myofibrillar and non-myofibrillar areas [∼86% and ∼14%, respectively ( > 0.05)], indicating that initial adaptations to LL-BFR are primarily characterized by conventional hypertrophy rather than disproportionate non-myofibrillar expansion. Additionally, extracellular spacing was not significantly altered between protocols. In summary, our study reveals that LL-BFR, like HL-RT, induces skeletal muscle hypertrophy with proportional changes in the areas occupied by myofibrillar, non-myofibrillar, and extracellular components.

Citing Articles

Mechanisms of muscle repair after peripheral nerve injury by electrical stimulation combined with blood flow restriction training.

Chu X, Sun J, Liang J, Liu W, Xing Z, Li Q Sports Med Health Sci. 2025; 7(3):173-184.

PMID: 39991124 PMC: 11846447. DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2024.10.002.


Impact of low-load resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction on muscle strength, endurance, and oxidative capacity: A pilot study.

Davis B, Stampley J, Granger J, Scott M, Allerton T, Johannsen N Physiol Rep. 2024; 12(12):e16041.

PMID: 38888154 PMC: 11184470. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.16041.

References
1.
Goreham C, Green H, Ranney D . High-resistance training and muscle metabolism during prolonged exercise. Am J Physiol. 1999; 276(3):E489-96. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1999.276.3.E489. View

2.
Fox C, Mesquita P, Godwin J, Angleri V, Damas F, Ruple B . Frequent Manipulation of Resistance Training Variables Promotes Myofibrillar Spacing Changes in Resistance-Trained Individuals. Front Physiol. 2022; 12:773995. PMC: 8715010. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.773995. View

3.
Patterson S, Hughes L, Warmington S, Burr J, Scott B, Owens J . Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety. Front Physiol. 2019; 10:533. PMC: 6530612. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533. View

4.
Claassen H, Gerber C, Hoppeler H, Luthi J, Vock P . Muscle filament spacing and short-term heavy-resistance exercise in humans. J Physiol. 1989; 409:491-5. PMC: 1190456. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017509. View

5.
MacDougall J, Sale D, Elder G, Sutton J . Muscle ultrastructural characteristics of elite powerlifters and bodybuilders. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1982; 48(1):117-26. DOI: 10.1007/BF00421171. View