» Articles » PMID: 38443650

Increased Nasal Blimp1 + Treg Cells After Sublingual Immunotherapy Reflect the Efficacy of Treatment in Allergic Rhinitis

Overview
Journal Adv Ther
Date 2024 Mar 5
PMID 38443650
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) plays a pivotal role in altering the immune status and tissue responses in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study focuses on the impact of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) involving dust mite drops, exploring the modulation of regulatory T cells (Treg) and their specific marker, BLIMP1, in the nasal mucosa.

Methods: Immune cells were isolated from nasal lavage fluid of patients with AR undergoing SLIT (n = 94). Treg cells were analyzed for BLIMP1 expression, and chemokine levels associated with Treg recruitment were assessed using Luminex assay. Patients were categorized on the basis of SLIT efficacy and followed for changes after discontinuation.

Results: SLIT induced a significant increase in nasal Treg cells (7.09 ± 2.59% vs. 0.75 ± 0.27%, P < 0.0001). BLIMP1 expression in Treg cells notably increased after SLIT (0.36 ± 0.22% to 16.86 ± 5.74%, P < 0.0001). Ineffective SLIT cases exhibited lower levels of nasal Treg and Blimp1 + Treg cells (both P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed their potential as efficacy predictors (AUC = 0.908 and 0.968, respectively). SLIT discontinuation led to a significant reduction in Treg and Blimp1 + Treg cells (P < 0.001), emphasizing their maintenance during treatment. Pro-inflammatory cytokines decreased (P < 0.001), while CCL2 associated with Treg recruitment increased (P = 0.0015).

Conclusion: Elevated nasal Blimp1 + Treg cells serve as a predictive biomarker for SLIT responsiveness in pediatric AR. Their influence on immunotherapy effectiveness contributes to a nuanced understanding of SLIT mechanisms, allowing for disease stratification and personalized treatment plans. This study offers scientific support for predicting SLIT efficacy, enhancing the prospects of improved treatment outcomes in AR.

References
1.
Brozek J, Bousquet J, Agache I, Agarwal A, Bachert C, Bosnic-Anticevich S . Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines-2016 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017; 140(4):950-958. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050. View

2.
Alvarez-Cuesta E, Bousquet J, Canonica G, Durham S, Malling H, Valovirta E . Standards for practical allergen-specific immunotherapy. Allergy. 2006; 61 Suppl 82:1-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01219_1.x. View

3.
Cox L, Linnemann D, Nolte H, Weldon D, Finegold I, Nelson H . Sublingual immunotherapy: a comprehensive review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006; 117(5):1021-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.02.040. View

4.
Chen B, Long Z, Huang Y, Zeng J . [Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with dermatophagoides farinae drops in monosensitized and polysensitized patients with allergic rhinitis]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013; 48(7):549-54. View

5.
Cui L, Li J, Li Y, Xia Z . Long-Term Efficacy of Sublingual Mite Immunotherapy in Monosensitized and Polysensitized Children with Allergic Rhinitis: A 7-Year Prospective Study. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2019; 180(2):144-149. DOI: 10.1159/000500524. View