» Articles » PMID: 38440386

Patient Weight Has Diverse Effects on the Prescribing of Different Antibiotics to Dogs

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2024 Mar 5
PMID 38440386
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Various factors including body weight-associated treatment cost may influence the probability of dispensing antibiotics to dogs in first-opinion practice, but their effect on specific drug choice remains unclear.

Methods: Multiple membership regression modeling was used to investigate the probability of dispensing 12 different antibiotics to dogs of different weights in the context of various disease presentations, using anonymized data obtained from electronic health records of 18 clinics between 2020 and 2022. Data from 14,259 dogs were analyzed.

Results: Treatment choice varied significantly with animal weight. Higher body weight was associated with an increased likelihood of dispensing lower cost antimicrobials such as amoxicillin and trimethoprim sulfonamide, while use of higher cost antimicrobials such as cefovecin was strongly biased to smaller animals. However, these effects were limited when restricted treatment options were available for the target condition.

Conclusion: This work demonstrates that anticipated financial costs may result in different treatment choices for canine patients depending on their body weight. Further work is needed to understand the impact of financial pressures on veterinarians' treatment choices, and the implications for the optimization of antimicrobial stewardship in first opinion practice.

Citing Articles

Calculation of standard bodyweights for dogs, cats, rabbits, and guinea pigs.

Becker S, ONeill D, Frosini S, Stapleton L, Hughes D, Brodbelt D PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318734.

PMID: 39946494 PMC: 11825090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318734.

References
1.
Weese J . Bacterial enteritis in dogs and cats: diagnosis, therapy, and zoonotic potential. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2011; 41(2):287-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.12.005. View

2.
Mateus A, Brodbelt D, Barber N, Stark K . Qualitative study of factors associated with antimicrobial usage in seven small animal veterinary practices in the UK. Prev Vet Med. 2014; 117(1):68-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.05.007. View

3.
Hardefeldt L, Holloway S, Trott D, Shipstone M, Barrs V, Malik R . Antimicrobial Prescribing in Dogs and Cats in Australia: Results of the Australasian Infectious Disease Advisory Panel Survey. J Vet Intern Med. 2017; 31(4):1100-1107. PMC: 5508328. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.14733. View

4.
Kroemer S, El Garch F, Galland D, Petit J, Woehrle F, Boulouis H . Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria isolated from infections in cats and dogs throughout Europe (2002-2009). Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 37(2):97-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2013.10.001. View

5.
Odoi A, Samuels R, Carter C, Smith J . Antibiotic prescription practices and opinions regarding antimicrobial resistance among veterinarians in Kentucky, USA. PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0249653. PMC: 8049335. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249653. View