» Articles » PMID: 38436905

A Cross-National Comparison of Biosimilars Pricing in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy

Abstract

Background: Biosimilar medicines are defined as biological products highly similar to an already licensed biological product (RP). The market entry of biosimilars is expected to reduce the costs of biological treatments.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the range of differences between the prices of biosimilars and the corresponding RP for biologicals approved in four countries.

Method: This is a cross-national comparison of pricing of biosimilars in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, and Italy. The study examined online price databases provided by the national authorities of the investigated countries. Biosimilar price difference was calculated by subtracting the unit price of the biosimilar by the unit price of the RP, and then dividing it by the unit price of the RP. The results were presented as percentage.

Results: Brazil had the highest median price reduction (- 36.3%) in biosimilars price, followed by Italy (- 20.0%) and Argentina (- 18.6%). All the biosimilars in Italy were priced below the RP presenting a minimum reduction of 6.3%, while in Australia, most of the prices of biosimilars were equal to the RP. In Argentina, one infliximab-biosimilar displayed price above the RP (40.7%) while the lower priced brand had a reduction of 14.4%. Brazil had four biosimilars with prices above the respective RP, including isophane insulin (1), insulin glargine (1) and somatropin (2).

Conclusion: The study revealed a marked dispersion in the price's differences between biosimilars and RP across the studied countries. Governments should evaluate whether their policies have been successful in improving affordability of biological therapies.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Rituximab Biosimilar RTXM83: A Retrospective Extension Study in Brazilian Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Delamain M, Cardoso A, Pericole F, da Silva Araujo S, Fogliatto L, Higashi M Oncol Ther. 2024; 12(3):585-598.

PMID: 38829416 PMC: 11333413. DOI: 10.1007/s40487-024-00282-7.

References
1.
Laires P, Exposto F, Mesquita R, Martins A, Cunha-Miranda L, Fonseca J . Patients' access to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between Portugal and other European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2012; 14(6):875-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-012-0432-5. View

2.
Peeters M, Planchard D, Pegram M, Goncalves J, Bocquet F, Jang H . Biosimilars in an era of rising oncology treatment options. Future Oncol. 2021; 17(29):3881-3892. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0546. View

3.
Burisch J, Vardi H, Schwartz D, Friger M, Kiudelis G, Kupcinskas J . Health-care costs of inflammatory bowel disease in a pan-European, community-based, inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 5(5):454-464. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30012-1. View

4.
Gleeson D, Townsend B, Lopert R, Lexchin J, Moir H . Financial costs associated with monopolies on biologic medicines in Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2017; 43(1):36-42. DOI: 10.1071/AH17031. View

5.
Agirrezabal I, Sanchez-Iriso E, Mandar K, Cabases J . Real-World Budget Impact of the Adoption of Insulin Glargine Biosimilars in Primary Care in England (2015-2018). Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(8):1767-1773. DOI: 10.2337/dc19-2395. View