» Articles » PMID: 38435378

Suppression of Resistive Coupling in Nanogap Electrochemical Cell: Resolution of Dual Pathways for Dopamine Oxidation

Overview
Date 2024 Mar 4
PMID 38435378
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A nanogap cell involves two working electrodes separated by a nanometer-wide solution to enable unprecedented electrochemical measurements. The powerful nanogap measurements, however, can be seriously interfered with by resistive coupling between the two electrodes to yield erroneous current responses. Herein, we employ the nanogap cell based on double carbon-fiber microelectrodes to suppress resistive coupling for the assessment of intrinsic current responses. Specifically, we modify a commercial bipotentiostat to compensate the Ohmic potential drop shared by the two electrodes through the common current pathway with a fixed resistance in the solution. Resistive coupling through both non-Faradaic and Faradaic processes is suppressed to eliminate erroneous current responses. Our approach is applied to investigate the mechanism of dopamine oxidation at carbon-fiber microelectrodes as important electrochemical sensors for the crucial neurotransmitter. Resistive coupling is suppressed to manifest the intrinsic current responses based on the oxidation of both adsorbed and non-adsorbed forms of dopamine to the respective forms of dopamine--quinone. The simultaneous dual oxidation pathways are observed for the first time and can be mediated through either non-concerted or concerted mechanisms of adsorption-coupled electron transfer. The two mechanisms are not discriminated for the two-electron oxidation of dopamine because it can not be determined whether the intermediate, dopamine semi-quinone, is adsorbed on the electrode surface. Significantly, our approach will be useful to manifest intrinsic current responses without resistive coupling for nanogaps and microgaps, which are too narrow to eliminate the common solution resistance by optimizing the position of a reference electrode.

References
1.
Meunier C, Denison J, McCarty G, Sombers L . Interpreting Dynamic Interfacial Changes at Carbon Fiber Microelectrodes Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Langmuir. 2020; 36(15):4214-4223. PMC: 7336537. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03941. View

2.
Kurapati N, Janda D, Balla R, Huang S, Leonard K, Amemiya S . Nanogap-Resolved Adsorption-Coupled Electron Transfer by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy: Implications for Electrocatalysis. Anal Chem. 2022; 94(51):17956-17963. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04008. View

3.
Bath B, Michael D, Trafton B, Joseph J, Runnels P, Wightman R . Subsecond adsorption and desorption of dopamine at carbon-fiber microelectrodes. Anal Chem. 2001; 72(24):5994-6002. DOI: 10.1021/ac000849y. View

4.
Robinson D, Hermans A, Seipel A, Wightman R . Monitoring rapid chemical communication in the brain. Chem Rev. 2008; 108(7):2554-84. PMC: 3110685. DOI: 10.1021/cr068081q. View

5.
Manring N, Strini M, Smeltz J, Pathirathna P . Simultaneous detection of neurotransmitters and Cu using double-bore carbon fiber microelectrodes fast-scan cyclic voltammetry. RSC Adv. 2023; 13(48):33844-33851. PMC: 10658548. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra06218j. View