» Articles » PMID: 38433510

SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Physicians over Time in Ontario, Canada: a Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Croat Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Mar 4
PMID 38433510
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To assess this risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Ontario physicians by specialty and in comparison with non-physician controls during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the primary outcome was incident SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Secondary outcomes were hospitalization, use of critical care, and mortality.

Results: From March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022, 6172/30 617 (20%) active Ontario physicians tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Infection was less likely if physicians were older (OR 0.78 [0.76-0.81] per 10 years), rural residents (OR 0.70 [0.59-0.83]), and lived in more marginalized neighborhoods (OR 0.74 [0.62-0.89]), but more likely if they were female (OR 1.14 [1.07-1.22]), worked in long-term care settings (OR 1.16 [1.02-1.32]), had higher patient volumes (OR 2.05 [1.82-2.30] for highest vs lowest), and were pediatricians (OR 1.25 [1.09-1.44]). Compared with community-matched controls (n=29 763), physicians had a higher risk of infection during the first two waves of the pandemic (OR 1.38 [1.20-1.59]) but by wave 3 the risk was no longer significantly different (OR 0.93 [0.83-1.05]). Physicians were less likely to be hospitalized within 14 days of their first positive PCR test than non-physicians (P<0.0001), but there was no difference in the use of critical care (P=0.48) or mortality (P=0.15).

Conclusion: Physicians had higher rates of infection than community-matched controls during the first two waves of the pandemic in Ontario, but not from wave 3 onward. Physicians practicing in long-term care facilities and pediatricians were more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than other physicians.

Citing Articles

Differential risk of healthcare workers versus the general population during outbreak, war and pandemic crises.

Ioannidis J Eur J Epidemiol. 2024; 39(11):1211-1219.

PMID: 39565536 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-024-01169-7.

References
1.
Wu C, Qian Y . The gender peak effect: Women are most vulnerable to infections during COVID-19 peaks. Front Public Health. 2022; 10:937179. PMC: 9395988. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.937179. View

2.
Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, Bennett J, Peladeau N, Leszcz M . The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003; 168(10):1245-51. PMC: 154178. View

3.
Kim R, Nachman S, Fernandes R, Meyers K, Taylor M, LeBlanc D . Comparison of COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0241956. PMC: 7725299. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241956. View

4.
Williams M, Ryniker L, Schwartz R, Shaam P, Finuf K, Corley S . Physician challenges and supports during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study. Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:1055495. PMC: 9780028. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1055495. View

5.
Habbous S, Hota S, Allen V, Henry M, Hellsten E . Changes in hospitalizations and emergency department respiratory viral diagnosis trends before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada. PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0287395. PMC: 10275476. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287395. View