» Articles » PMID: 38427814

Determining the Degree of Perceptible Static Eyelid Asymmetry and Effect of Face Inversion: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the degree of static eyelid asymmetry required to be perceptible and whether this is affected by image inversion.

Methods: Images of 3 volunteers were digitally manipulated to have eyelid asymmetry of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, or 1.5 mm of 3 different types, upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction. Forty-nine laypersons stated whether the images were symmetrical or asymmetrical. A separate inversion survey, completed by 29 clinicians, consisted of symmetrical images and 1 mm asymmetrical images, with half being inverted.

Results: Upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction were not detected by most laypeople at 0.5 mm of severity (18.9%, 6.7%, 18.9% detection, respectively) but all 3 were detected by the majority of participants once asymmetry reached 1 mm severity (65.7%, 61.8%, 51.0% detection, respectively) and rose to over 70% identification at 1.5 mm (92.2%, 73.5%, 73.5% detection, respectively). Inversion of the images led to 19.7% lower rates of correct identification of asymmetrical faces compared with images presented in the correct orientation (80.7% asymmetry identified in normal images, 61.0% inverted, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: All asymmetries were detectable by a majority of laypersons at a severity of 1 mm. Image inversion decreases a clinician's ability to detect a 1 mm asymmetry, indicating an impaired asymmetry perception in the intraoperative view. This study provides research to counsel patients with varying degrees of eyelid asymmetry.

References
1.
Richards H, Jenkinson E, Rumsey N, White P, Garrott H, Herbert H . The psychological well-being and appearance concerns of patients presenting with ptosis. Eye (Lond). 2013; 28(3):296-302. PMC: 3965808. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2013.264. View

2.
Naini F, Donaldson A, McDonald F, Cobourne M . Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 70(1):192-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.055. View

3.
Hohman M, Kim S, Heller E, Frigerio A, Heaton J, Hadlock T . Determining the threshold for asymmetry detection in facial expressions. Laryngoscope. 2013; 124(4):860-5. PMC: 4392713. DOI: 10.1002/lary.24331. View

4.
Wang T, Wessels L, Hussain G, Merten S . Discriminative Thresholds in Facial Asymmetry: A Review of the Literature. Aesthet Surg J. 2017; 37(4):375-385. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw271. View

5.
Ercan I, Ozdemir S, Etoz A, Sigirli D, Tubbs R, Loukas M . Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis. J Anat. 2008; 213(6):663-9. PMC: 2666135. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.01002.x. View