» Articles » PMID: 38426238

Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Healthcare Workers' Adherence to Vaccination Against Vaccine-preventable Diseases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 1993 to 2022

Overview
Journal Euro Surveill
Date 2024 Mar 1
PMID 38426238
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BackgroundVaccination adherence among healthcare workers (HCWs) is fundamental for the prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) in healthcare. This safeguards HCWs' well-being, prevents transmission of infections to vulnerable patients and contributes to public health.AimThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe interventions meant to increase HCWs' adherence to vaccination and estimate the effectiveness of these interventions.MethodsWe searched literature in eight databases and performed manual searches in relevant journals and the reference lists of retrieved articles. The study population included any HCW with potential occupational exposure to VPDs. We included experimental and quasi-experimental studies presenting interventions aimed at increasing HCWs' adherence to vaccination against VPDs. The post-intervention vaccination adherence rate was set as the main outcome. We included the effect of interventions in the random-effects and subgroup meta-analyses.ResultsThe systematic review considered 48 studies on influenza and Tdap vaccination from database and manual searches, and 43 were meta-analysed. A statistically significant, positive effect was seen in multi-component interventions in randomised controlled trials (relative risk (RR) = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.13-1.66) and in observational studies (RR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.29-1.58). Vaccination adherence rate was higher in community care facilities (RR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.49-1.68) than in hospitals (RR = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.76-2.05).ConclusionInterventions aimed at increasing HCWs' adherence to vaccination against VPDs are effective, especially multi-component ones. Future research should determine the most effective framework of interventions for each setting, using appropriate study design for their evaluation, and should compare intervention components to understand their contribution to the effectiveness.

Citing Articles

Active offer of Tdap vaccination in a cohort of healthcare workers of Maternal and Neonatal Department: Data from a large hospital in Southern Italy.

Di Lorenzo A, Capodiferro L, Illuzzi M, Scaltrito C, Vimercati L, Moscara L Vaccine X. 2024; 19:100530.

PMID: 39157686 PMC: 11326957. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100530.


Influenza Vaccination of Romanian Medical Students during COVID-19 Times: From Knowledge to Behavior.

Enciu B, Pauna A, Chivu C, Sandulescu O, Crispo A, Diaconescu L Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(6).

PMID: 38932323 PMC: 11209290. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12060594.

References
1.
Song J, Park C, Jeong H, Cheong H, Kim W, Kim S . Effect of a hospital campaign for influenza vaccination of healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006; 27(6):612-7. DOI: 10.1086/504503. View

2.
Rakita R, Hagar B, Crome P, Lammert J . Mandatory influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: a 5-year study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010; 31(9):881-8. DOI: 10.1086/656210. View

3.
Calderon M, Feja K, Ford P, Frenkel L, Gram A, Spector D . Implementation of a pertussis immunization program in a teaching hospital: an argument for federally mandated pertussis vaccination of health care workers. Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36(6):392-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.027. View

4.
Pelullo C, Della Polla G, Napolitano F, Di Giuseppe G, Angelillo I . Healthcare Workers' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices about Vaccinations: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy. Vaccines (Basel). 2020; 8(2). PMC: 7348811. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8020148. View

5.
Saunier F, Berthelot P, Mottet-Auselo B, Pelissier C, Fontana L, Botelho-Nevers E . Impact of a decision-aid tool on influenza vaccine coverage among HCW in two French hospitals: A cluster-randomized trial. Vaccine. 2020; 38(36):5759-5763. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.011. View